Home / Project

Summary of Land Compensation Costs of the Project in Thinh Dan Ward.


3.2.2.3. Summary of land compensation costs of the project in Thinh Dan ward.

Table 3.7: Summary results of land compensation costs



STT


Soil type

P. Thinh Dan

Area (m 2 )

Total amount (VND)

Rate (%)

1

Agricultural land

90,287.3

30,483,719,820

13.79

2

Non-agricultural land

73,556.6

190.511.925.250

86.21

3

Unused land

0

0

0

Total

163,843.9

220.995.645.070

100

Maybe you are interested!

(Source: City Land Fund Development Center, 2017) Through the table above, we can see that although agricultural land occupies a larger recovered area, the compensation cost is less than the price of non-agricultural land.

Industrial land (including residential land and garden land on the same plot) specifically: compensation costs

Agricultural land accounts for 13.79% while compensation costs for non-agricultural land account for 86.21% of the total compensation costs for these two land groups. Thus, determining the price of residential land at each plot location is close to the market price at the same time, resolving people's questions surrounding the determination of residential land prices, creating conditions for the project implementation progress to be accelerated to meet the requirements.

3.2.2.4. Results of compensation for assets on land in Thinh Dan ward, TPTN.

Table 3.8: Compensation results for assets on land


STT

Compensation list

P. Thinh Dan

Total amount (VND)

Rate (%)

1

Trees, crops

2,196,274,351

2.47

2

Property, structures

86.314.752.669

97.17

3

Production compensation

317,128,300

0.36

Total

88.828.155.320

100

(Source: City Land Fund Development Center, 2017)


Through the above table, we can see that the compensation for assets and structures accounts for a high proportion of 97.17% of the total compensation value of the three categories of trees and crops; assets and structures and compensation for output. Thus, the assets here are not only houses and works serving daily life on residential land but also barns serving agricultural production and livestock breeding for households. Compensation for output here is the annual output of rice and crops on rice land and flat land; fish farming on aquaculture land. The construction of many livestock barns on land has led to a decrease in the area of ​​​​planting trees, crops, etc., leading to low compensation costs for output. However, the compensation and support policies have fully met the wishes of the people, helping them improve their lives after their land was recovered for project implementation.

3.2.2.5. Results of total GPMB support funding

Table 3.9: Summary of GPMB support funds


STT

Support categories

Amount paid (VND)

P. Thinh Dan

1

Rental assistance

489,600,000

2

Support policy families

9,000,000

3

Support for stable life

1,013,760,000


4

Support for career transition training and job search


21,688,136,700

Total

23,200,496,700

(Source: City Land Fund Development Center, 2017)

Support for vocational training, job search, and life stabilization is the main support in the budget for agricultural land support for people. With agricultural land accounting for a high proportion of the total area,


In terms of recovered land, these two supports are higher than other supports. Thus, for people using agricultural land, the support according to the state's policies (including support for policy families) has created conditions for people to stabilize their lives after the state recovers land, thereby avoiding unnecessary consequences for the social environment around the area of ​​land recovery for project implementation.

3.2.2.6. Resettlement arrangement results

Table 3.10: Resettlement arrangement results



STT


Content

P. Thinh Dan

Number of households

Acreage

(m 2 )

1

On-site resettlement support

0

0

2

Support for self-arranging accommodation for resettlement

0

0


3

Arrange resettlement in resettlement areas in the city


278


32,532.1

Total

278

32,532.1

(Source: Investigation results)


Of the 339 households whose land was recovered, 278 households requested resettlement (accounting for 82%). These households were resettled in the city's resettlement areas such as: Residential Area No. 6, Thinh Dan Ward, Viet Bac Resettlement Area, Quang Trung Ward... In these resettlement areas, the infrastructure has been completed to ensure that people can build houses immediately after completing resettlement procedures according to state regulations. Thus, people's lives have gradually stabilized after the state recovered land to implement the project.


3.3. Assess the impact of implementing compensation for site clearance on the lives, labor, jobs and income of people whose land is recovered.

3.3.1. Results of agricultural land recovery

Table 3.11: Percentage of agricultural land recovered from households


TT

Target

Unit

Result

1

Number of households surveyed:

Household

100


Number of households whose agricultural land was recovered over 70%

Household

32


Number of households whose agricultural land is recovered is over 30% - 70%

Household

43


Number of households whose agricultural land is recovered is less than 30%

Household

25

2

Average area of ​​agricultural land recovered/household

m 2

293.35


Average compensation support/household

Million Dong

214.45

(Source: Survey data)

Through the table above, we can see that 43/100 households have 30%-70% of their agricultural land recovered, 25/100 households have <30% of their agricultural land recovered; these households are mainly households that have to move or own a lot of agricultural land but the area of ​​agricultural land recovered is small. There are 32/100 households with >70% of their agricultural land recovered, these are households that have almost all of their agricultural land recovered to implement the project. Corresponding to these percentages of land loss, there are corresponding support amounts, for example: households whose agricultural land is recovered under 30% will receive 3 months of support to stabilize their lives for households that do not move, and 6 months of support for households that have to move.


3.3.2. Impact of the project on people's lives after land acquisition

Table 3.12: Methods of using compensation and support money of households


STT

Target

Total (households)

Rate (%)


Total

100

100

1

Investment in production and business of non-agricultural services, including:

21

21


Use over 70% of compensation for this purpose

13

13

Use less than 70% of the compensation for this purpose

8

8

2

Credit (including savings and loans)

28

28


Savings

25

25

Loan

3

3

3

Construction and home repair

19

19

4

Shopping for appliances

17

17

5

Apprentice

15

15

6

Other purposes

0

0

(Source: Survey data)

Through the table above, we can see that 21/100 people surveyed used the compensation money for business purposes, opening shops at home or at the resettlement site where they were arranged. 25/100 people surveyed used the compensation money for savings purposes. Most of these people received large compensation payments, so they chose to deposit money in banks with the mindset of depositing money there to get higher interest rates. 19/100 people surveyed used the compensation money to build houses in the resettlement area or repair and build right on the land plot that was partially recovered. 15/100 people surveyed used the compensation money to go to vocational training or for relatives to learn a trade to have more stable jobs in the future.


3.3.3. Impact of the project on labor, employment and income of people after land acquisition

Impact of compensation work on labor and employment of people after land acquisition

Labor and employment are two factors that determine income and are the cause of the gap between rich and poor. Therefore, when the State reclaims land for project implementation, the most commonly used compensation method is cash compensation. Such support, along with the process of converting land used for agricultural purposes to industrial and urban development, the implementation of compensation and support policies for people whose land is reclaimed has had a clear impact on the labor and employment issues of the people.

The results of the investigation on labor and employment of households whose land was recovered for project implementation are shown in the following table:

Table 3.13: Labor and employment situation of households in the GPMB compensation area


TT


Target

Before being collected

return

After being

recall

Total (People)

Rate (%)

Total (People)

Rate (%)

1

Number of households surveyed

100


100


2

Average number of people/household

4


4


3

Number of people in working age

271

100

278

100

3.1

Farming

139

51

120

44

3.2

Work in businesses

29

11

39

14

3.3

Small business, service

37

14

41

15

3.4

Officials and civil servants

20

7

20

7

3.5

Do other jobs

25

9

29

11

3.6

No job

12

4

16

6

4

Number of workers working elsewhere

9

3

14

5

(Source: Survey data)



Figure 3.1: Labor situation before and after revocation

According to Figure 3.1 above, the number of people of working age working in agriculture in the project area has decreased relatively before and after the land recovery from 51% to 44%. Other occupations have tended to increase, such as working in enterprises increasing from 11% to 14% and trading and services increasing from 14% to 15% because the land of households has been recovered for industrial and urban development. The current number of agricultural workers is mainly raising livestock or growing vegetables on the remaining plots, but the income is not worth much, so many households have abandoned the land or let people who do not have land or have little land to work on. Instead of farming, the main labor force now shifts to working in businesses, small businesses, services and other jobs such as motorbike taxi drivers, hired laborers, street vendors, bamboo and rattan vendors... Many households produce pottery, bricks, bamboo and rattan products, many households make conical hats... But the consumption market for these products is still very slow and has not received the attention of local authorities to provide support solutions.

Impact of compensation work on people's income after land acquisition.


Table 3.14: Income situation of households after land recovery


STT

Target

Total

Rate (%)


Total number of households surveyed

100

100

1

Number of households with higher income

86

86

2

Number of households with constant income

14

14

3

Number of households with lower income

0

0

(Source: Survey data)

From the above table, we can see that the number of households with higher income accounts for a high proportion of 86% of the total 100 surveyed households. Most of these households have large compensation and support payments; some deposit money in banks to get high interest rates; a few invest in business, thus increasing their income. 14% of the total number of surveyed households have unchanged income, these households are mainly households whose land was partially recovered or a small area of ​​land was recovered, so the compensation and support payments are less. Thus, after the project, people's lives have gradually stabilized, their income has gradually increased, contributing to stabilizing the socio-political economy in the project area.

3.3.4. Evaluation of compensation results through survey of opinions of people whose land was recovered

Table 3.15: Summary of results of people's opinions in the GPMB area through the survey form

STT

Content

Number of votes

Rate (%)

I

Implementation work

100

100

1

Propaganda work


Good

86

86


Not good

14

14

2

Implementation progress




Fast

89

89


Slow

11

11

3

About compensation price


Satisfactory

72

72

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *