Research on factors affecting lending decisions for small and medium-sized enterprise customers at commercial banks in the Northwest region of Vietnam - 26


APPENDIX 8: PERSON CORRELATION TEST


Correlations



TCDN_TB


TSTC_TB


LSTD_TB


VXH_TB

MQHNH_T B


Decision

TCDN_T B

Pearson Correlation

1

-.096

-.142 **

.034

.128 *

.111 *

Sig. (2-tailed)


.070

.007

.519

.016

.037

N

355

355

355

355

355

355

TSTC_TB

Pearson Correlation

-.096

1

.102

.002

.011

.540 **

Sig. (2-tailed)

.070


.055

.964

.838

.000

N

355

355

355

355

355

355

LSTD_TB

Pearson Correlation

-.142 **

.102

1

-.091

-.128 *

.236 **

Sig. (2-tailed)

.007

.055


.087

.016

.000

N

355

355

355

355

355

355

VXH_TB

Pearson Correlation

.034

.002

-.091

1

.057

-.015

Sig. (2-tailed)

.519

.964

.087


.280

.783

N

355

355

355

355

355

355

MQHNH_ TB

Pearson Correlation

.128 *

.011

-.128 *

.057

1

.289 **

Sig. (2-tailed)

.016

.838

.016

.280


.000

N

355

355

355

355

355

355

Decision

Pearson Correlation

.111 *

.540 **

.236 **

-.015

.289 **

1

Sig. (2-tailed)

.037

.000

.000

.783

.000


N

355

355

355

355

355

355

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Maybe you are interested!

Research on factors affecting lending decisions for small and medium-sized enterprise customers at commercial banks in the Northwest region of Vietnam - 26


APPENDIX 9: BINARY LOGISTIC REGRESSION TEST

1ST INSPECTION


Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients


Chi-square

df

Sig.

Step 1

Step

226,493

5

.000

Block

226,493

5

.000

Model

226,493

5

.000


Model Summary

Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1

206.370 a

.472

.669

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.


Classification Table a


Observed

Predicted

Decision


Percentage Correct


Loan denial

Loan Approval

Step 1

Decision

Loan denial

90

16

84.9

Loan Approval

16

233

93.6

Overall Percentage



91.0

a. The cut value is .500


Variables in the Equation


B

SE

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

Step 1 a

TCDN_TB

1,067

.270

15,549

1

.000

2,906

TSTC_TB

2,414

.293

67,818

1

.000

11,174

LSTD_TB

1,499

.264

32,339

1

.000

4,479

VXH_TB

-.224

.208

1.155

1

.283

.800

MQHNH_TB

1,759

.270

42,362

1

.000

5.808

Constant

-19.542

2,576

57,557

1

.000

.000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: TCDN_TB, TSTC_TB, LSTD_TB, VXH_TB, MQHNH_TB.


SECOND INSPECTION


Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients


Chi-square

df

Sig.

Step 1

Step

225,335

4

.000

Block

225,335

4

.000

Model

225,335

4

.000


Model Summary

Step

-2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R Square

Nagelkerke R Square

1

207,528 a

.470

.667

a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 7 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.


Classification Table a


Observed

Predicted

Decision


Percentage Correct


Loan denial

Loan Approval

Step 1

Decision

Loan denial

87

19

82.1

Loan Approval

16

233

93.6

Overall Percentage



90.1

a. The cut value is .500


Variables in the Equation


B

SE

Wald

df

Sig.

Exp(B)

Step 1 a

TCDN_TB

1,010

.263

14,802

1

.000

2,746

TSTC_TB

2,386

.290

67,687

1

.000

10,874

LSTD_TB

1,521

.262

33,763

1

.000

4,576

MQHNH_TB

1,739

.268

42,048

1

.000

5,690

Constant

-19.975

2,541

61,791

1

.000

.000

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: TCDN_TB, TSTC_TB, LSTD_TB, MQHNH_TB.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *