Appendix 2
MINUTES OF SCIENTIFIC SEMINAR
COMMENTS ON FACTORS AFFECTING HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT OF HOTEL ENTERPRISES IN KIEN GIANG PROVINCE
I. TIME AND LOCATION:
The workshop will be held at 8:00 a.m. on February 7, 2019 at Kien Giang College.
II. PARTICIPANTS:
1. Chairing the Workshop was Ms. Nguyen Thi Hoang Quyen - Vice Principal of Kien Giang College.
2. Conference Secretary Mr. Trinh Minh Tan - Head of Quality Assurance Department, Kien Giang College.
3. Guests: Managers of 3 to 5 star hotels in Kien Giang province. Guests include:
STT
Full name | Hotel | Position | |
1. | Tran Dat | Vinpearl Resort PQ 5 stars | Restaurant Management |
2. | Lam Hoang Hai | Novotel Resort PQ 5 stars | Deputy of Entertainment Department |
3. | Dao Ngoc Anh Thu | Seashell PQ Hotel and Spa 5 stars | Front Desk Manager |
4. | Le Van Truong | Vinpearl Resort PQ 5 stars | Luggage Manager |
5. | Hoang Tuan Anh | JW Marriott Emerald Bay PQ 5 stars | Manage reservations |
6. | Ngo Dinh Dung | Radisson Blue PQ 5 star | Technical Team Leader |
7. | Le Thien Phuc | Toan Hai Van 3 stars | International Administrative City |
8. | Mai Xuan Khanh | Mercury Villa Resort 4 stars | Executive Chef |
9. | Nguyen Minh Canh | Mercury Resort & Villas 4 stars | IT Team Leader |
10. | Tran Thi Thuy Ha | Famiana Resort and Spa 4 stars | Human resource management |
11. | Tran Thi Tam | Sol Beach House PQ 4 stars | Human resource management |
12. | Nguyen Huyen Phuong | The Shell Resort 4 stars | Human resource management |
13. | Phan Thi Lan Phuong | Salinda Resort PQ Island 5 stars | Human Resources |
14. | Duong Van Ta | Vinpearl Resort & Spa PQ 5 stars | Room Management |
15. | Cao Hai Ha | Novotel Resort PQ 5 stars | Kidclub Leader |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Factors Affecting the Improvement of Human Resource Quality of Enterprises -
What Are The Main Factors Affecting Capital Mobilization For Human Resource Development Today? -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Evaluation of human resource training quality at ÊMM Hue Hotel - 17 -
Identifying and controlling factors affecting the quality of accounting information in the environment of applying enterprise resource planning system ERP in Vietnamese enterprises - 12

III. CONTENT OF THE SEMINAR:
1. The secretary states the reason and introduces the participants.
2. Chairing the workshop to present the contents of factors and scales affecting human resource development of hotel businesses in Kien Giang province.
a. Criteria for evaluating human resource development of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province:
STT
Observable variable content | |
1 | The current number of workers does not meet job requirements. |
2 | Human resource quality is improved through training programs and activities. human resource development |
STT
Observable variable content | |
3 | Human resource structure has not kept up with current hotel development needs. |
4 | Labor productivity is gradually improved. |
b. Factors constituting the quality of human resources of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province
STT
Content of observed variables according to research proposal | |
1. | Workers perform their work proficiently. |
2. | Workers with good health ensure work at the enterprise. |
3. | The level of understanding workers have about the work they are doing |
4. | Employee confidence at work |
5. | Foreign language proficiency of workers |
6. | Computer literacy of workers |
7. | Employee responsibility to customers |
8. | Employees' willingness to serve customers |
9. | Employee understanding of customer needs |
10. | Polite, courteous, respectful and friendly attitude towards customers |
11. | Workers always dress nicely and politely according to regulations. |
12. | Communicate with colleagues, superiors and customers |
13. | Teamwork skills |
14. | Problem solving skills |
15. | Work organization skills |
16. | Decision making skills |
17. | Other skills:.......................................................... |
c. Factors affecting human resource development of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province:
STT
Content of observed variables as proposed by the study | |
Trends and needs of tourism development | |
1 | Tourism has become a need of people in developed countries. |
2 | Kien Giang has the opportunity to become a famous tourist destination in Vietnam and other countries. Asian countries |
3 | The number of international visitors to Kien Giang is increasing. |
4 | Kien Giang is a locality with great potential for tourism development. |
Internationalization of labor | |
5 | The ASEAN Economic Community has created opportunities for labor mobility between countries. in the area |
6 | There are many foreign workers coming to work at hotels in Kien Giang province. |
7 | Vietnam Tourism Occupational Standards (VTOS) are being considered as the standard Mutual recognition of professions among ASEAN countries in the field of tourism |
Characteristics of Kien Giang labor culture | |
8 | Workers have friendly attitude |
9 | Workers are always enthusiastic about their work. |
10 | Workers rarely speak up. |
Demographic characteristics | |
11 | Foreign language ability of workers is still limited |
12
The ability to use information technology of workers has not yet met the requirements. job demand | |
13 | Workers' knowledge of the hotel industry is still limited. |
14 | The ability to withstand work pressure of the workforce is not high. |
Employee treatment and employment policies of the enterprise | |
15 | The company's salary and bonus policy is suitable for employees. |
16 | The working environment of the company is friendly and positive. |
17 | The company's performance evaluation of employees is appropriate. |
18 | The company has many other policies to support employees: lunch, dormitory. accommodation, shuttle bus, leave regime... |
19 | The company's recruitment work is effective. |
20 | Workers are allowed to work according to their strengths and training. |
Training and career development | |
21 | Enterprises have strategies for human resource development, demand forecasting, and planning. recruitment and training |
22 | Enterprises regularly organize self-training so that employees can meet the requirements. job requirements; create opportunities for workers to study and improve their qualifications |
23 | Businesses often cooperate with training institutions to organize training for employees. labor |
24 | Practical and effective corporate training programs |
25 | Enterprises conduct assessments of employees' learning outcomes after training according to specific criteria |
26 | The company has a department in charge of human resource training. |
3. Experts' opinions:
- Experts agree on the criteria for evaluating human resource development of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province.
- Basically, experts agree with the researcher's proposal on the criteria for assessing the quality of labor in hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province, but to suit the business conditions of the hotel industry, experts suggest adding the factor of "Level of tolerance for pressure at work". Because in the hotel industry, the seasonality is high. During the peak season, workers will have to work more, contact with many customers, so it is difficult to avoid complaints from customers. Therefore, it requires workers to have the ability to withstand pressure at work well.
- The experts basically agreed with the content of the criteria on factors affecting human resource development. In addition, there were additional comments as follows:
+ Add new variables about the advantages of foreign workers compared to Vietnamese workers. This explains why Kien Giang hotel businesses recruit foreign workers to work for them.
+ Add new variable about cultural characteristics of Kien Giang workers "Workers will quit their jobs when they are not treated properly or fairly". Due to cultural characteristics
In Southern Vietnam, Kien Giang workers are often quiet but will react by quitting their jobs if they are not treated properly.
+ Add the variable that employees have many opportunities for career advancement, because according to experts, people always strive to improve in their work. Having many opportunities for career advancement will create better motivation for employees when performing their work. They will constantly strive to perform their work better through practicing skills and learning more knowledge related to their profession.
+ Add the variable that the enterprise has a separate fund for training activities. To carry out training requires spending costs, if the enterprise does not have a separate fund for training, it cannot develop human resources as desired.
3. The workshop chair made a speech to receive comments and thank the guests for attending.
IV. END:
The workshop ended at 11:15 a.m. the same day.
Appendix 3
IN-DEPTH INTERVIEW FORM
(For professionals)
Hello. My name is Nguyen Thi Hoang Quyen, a PhD student in Business Administration at Duy Tan University. I am currently researching the topic "Human resource development in hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province" . The purpose of the research is to propose solutions for human resource development in hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province in the coming time. The research topic is of great significance in meeting the human resource needs of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province in particular and developing the tourism industry in Kien Giang in general. The purpose of the questionnaire to survey the opinions of experts in the hotel sector is to identify factors affecting the development of human resources in hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province.
Could you please take a few moments to help me answer some of the relevant questions below. I would appreciate your help and your answers will be kept strictly confidential.
I. General information:
1. Full name of respondent:………………………………………………………
2. Name of hotel currently working:……………………………………………… 3. Star rating of hotel:…………………………………………………… 4. Position:……………………………………………………………………
5. Gender (SR): 1. Male 2. Female
6. Your age:
a. < 25 years old b. 25 – 34 years old c. 35 – 44 years old d. >44 years old
7. Number of years of work experience (including previous and current units):
a. < 3 years b. 3 – 5 years c. 5 – 10 years d. >10 years
II. Evaluation of factors affecting human resource development of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province.
1. According to you, what criteria should be used to evaluate human resource development? Besides the four proposed criteria, are there any other criteria?
2. According to you, what criteria should be used to evaluate the quality of labor in hotels in Kien Giang province? In addition to the suggested criteria, do you think they are sufficient? Do you think any additional criteria should be added?
3. According to you, what are the external factors affecting human resource development of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province? What are the internal factors affecting human resource development of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province? Are the factors proposed by the study sufficient? Should any factors be added or removed?
4. In your opinion, are the observed variables for factors affecting human resource development of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province sufficient to evaluate the factors? Is it necessary to add or remove any observed variables?
5. In your opinion, are the 5 levels: 1: Poor; 2: Weak; 3: Average; 4: Fair; 5: Good enough to evaluate the observed variables in the study?
6. Do you think it is necessary to adjust the wording or content of any observed variables?
THANK YOU VERY MUCH
LIST OF EXPERTS WHO INTERVIEWED IN DEPTH
STT
Full name | Unit | Position | |
1 | Duong Viet Sang | Vinpearl resort & Spa | Manage |
2 | Dang Minh Luan | Vinpearl PQ | Shift manager |
3 | The Citadel | Premier Residence PQ | Booking monitoring |
4 | Nguyen Phuoc Trung | Hoa Binh Rach Gia resort | Bar Manager |
5 | Phan Duy Linh | Red River Tourist | Tour booking management |
6 | Ha Kieu Anh | Vinoass Phu Quoc | Shift manager |
7 | La Xuan Chieu | Novotel PQ | Entertainment Team Leader |
8 | Le Vu Phuong | Salinda Resort - Phu Quoc | Luggage Manager |
9 | Nguyen Thi Kim Thu | Thien Thanh Resort | Front desk manager |
SURVEY FORM 01
(For business managers)
Hello. My name is Nguyen Thi Hoang Quyen, a PhD student in Business Administration at Duy Tan University. I am currently researching the topic "Human resource development in hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province" . The purpose of the research is to propose solutions for human resource development in hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province in the coming time. The research topic is of great significance in meeting the human resource needs of hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province in particular and developing the tourism industry in Kien Giang in general. The purpose of the questionnaire to survey the opinions of managers in the hotel sector is to identify factors in human resource development in hotel enterprises in Kien Giang province.
Could you please take a few moments to help me answer some of the relevant questions below. I would appreciate your help and your answers will be kept strictly confidential.
I. General information:
1. Full name of respondent:………………………………………………………
2. Name of hotel currently working:……………………………………………… 3. Star rating of hotel:…………………………………………………… 4. Position:……………………………………………………………………
5. Gender (SR): 1. Male 2. Female
6. Your age:
a. < 25 years old b. 25 – 34 years old c. 35 – 44 years old d. >44 years old
7. Number of years of work experience (including previous and current units):
a. < 3 years b. 3 – 5 years c. 5 – 10 years d. >10 years
II. Evaluation of labor quality:
1. What is your overall assessment of the employees working at the unit based on the following factors? (Choose by marking X one of the following levels: With 1. Poor - 2. Weak - 3. Average - 4. Fair - 5. Good)
STT
Element | Level | |||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1. | Workers perform their work successfully. proficient | |||||
2. | Workers with good health ensure work work at the enterprise | |||||
3. | The level of understanding of workers about their jobs doing | |||||
4. | Employee confidence at work | |||||
5. | Foreign language proficiency of workers | |||||
6. | Computer literacy of workers | |||||





