Evaluating Vietnam's Monetary Policy Management Process


published version. Commercial banks' business interest rates are still applied according to the agreement mechanism according to market supply and demand but cannot exceed 150% of the basic interest rate. However, the role of the basic interest rate as a market regulation tool of monetary policy has significantly decreased, mainly used as a measure against usury, since 2011 this interest rate is no longer reported in the Annual Report of the State Bank on monetary policy management. Along with the agreement interest rate mechanism, the refinancing interest rates, rediscount interest rates, open market operation bid rates and overnight lending rates in interbank electronic payments have become effective support tools for monetary policy management in recent times.

4.2.2.4 Refinancing policy


Refinancing is a form of credit provision by the State Bank to provide short-term capital and means of payment to credit institutions. The State Bank regulates and implements refinancing for credit institutions in forms such as loans secured by pledge of valuable papers, discounting valuable papers and other forms of refinancing (SBV 2020b).

The form of refinancing has changed through the documents of the Banking Ordinance in 1991, Decision No. 356/1999/QD-NHNN14 in 1999 and was uniformly regulated in the Law on the State Bank of Vietnam in 2007, accordingly refinancing includes lending secured by pledging valuable papers; discounting, rediscounting valuable papers; re-lending according to credit records. However, the form of re-lending according to credit records is no longer mentioned in the Law on the State Bank of Vietnam 2010, so the form of refinancing so far focuses on lending secured by pledging valuable papers; discounting, rediscounting valuable papers. The refinancing interest rate was issued under the Banking Ordinance in 1991 and began to be used as an important tool of monetary policy in Vietnam. The pair of refinancing interest rates and rediscount interest rates are considered effective tools to guide the market of monetary policy, especially since the role of the basic interest rate has faded due to the application of the negotiated interest rate management mechanism.


4.2.2.5 Exchange rate policy


The exchange rate of VND to USD is formed on the basis of foreign currency supply and demand in the market with State regulation. The State Bank announces the exchange rate, decides on the exchange rate regime, and the exchange rate management mechanism (SBV 2020b). The role of the exchange rate as a monetary policy tool has been clearly defined since the 1997 Law on the State Bank of Vietnam. Accordingly, the SBV determines to manage the exchange rate in combination with the synchronous and flexible management of monetary policy tools to regulate liquidity and VND interest rates, proactively promote communication and market orientation, thereby creating consensus among market members and improving the transparency and transmission efficiency of monetary policy.

Before 2015, the State Bank of Vietnam announced the average interbank exchange rate as a reference price for commercial banks to determine their business exchange rates with customers within the permitted range. 2016 marked a new phase in Vietnam's exchange rate management with Decision No. 2730/QD-NHNN issued on December 31, 2015 on announcing the central exchange rate of VND to USD. Accordingly, the central exchange rate of VND to USD is determined based on the reference to the weighted average exchange rate on the interbank foreign exchange market, the exchange rate on the international market of a number of currencies of a number of countries having trade, borrowing, debt repayment, and large investment relations with Vietnam, macroeconomic and monetary balances and monetary policy targets. The central exchange rate is flexibly changed in both directions, increasing/decreasing, helping to limit speculation and hoarding of foreign currencies.


BQLNH exchange rate

Central rate

25,000

24,000

23,000

22,000

21,000

20,000

19,000

18,000

17,000

2009M1

2009M5

2009M9

2010M1

2010M5

2010M9

2011M1

2011M5

2011M9

2012M1

2012M5

2012M9

2013M1

2013M5

2013M9

2014M1

2014M5

2014M9

2015M1

2015M5

2015M9

2016M1

2016M5

2016M9

2017M1

2017M5

2017M9

2018M1

2018M5

2018M9

2019M1

2019M5

2019M9

16,000



BQLNH exchange rate Floor exchange rate Ceiling exchange rate VCB selling rate


Figure 4.15 Exchange rate (VND/USD) period 2009 - 2019

Source: State Bank of Vietnam (2009 – 2019)


4.2.3 Evaluation of Vietnam's monetary policy management process

Vietnam's monetary policy management in the period of 2009 - 2019 according to the provisions of the Law on the State Bank aims at the ultimate goal of stabilizing the value of money expressed by the inflation target. The SBV's management goal is not clearly mentioned in legal documents, but through the process of monetary policy management as well as through specific targets or commitments mentioned periodically every year, it can be seen that the SBV chooses the growth of total means of payment, credit growth as intermediate targets or interbank market interest rates, credit institutions' reserves as operational targets of the SBV. Intermediate targets often refer to targets with specific figures, but operational targets are often just commitments to maintain stability or adjust up or down in a ratio compared to the previous year. Using performance targets without providing a specific number that can be measured will make it difficult to consistently operate the monetary policy, which affects the feasibility of achieving the set policy goals. In fact, the indicators of total means of payment as well as credit growth in the period 2009 - 2019 have many years of implementation figures that differ greatly from the set targets. With the final target, the ratio


Inflation rate in the period 2009 - 2019, apart from some years at a level close to the set target, in reality there were years with very high increases such as 2010, 2011 or years with very low actual inflation rate compared to the target such as 2012, 2014 and 2015. This difference, in addition to external impacts, partly reflects the difficulty of Vietnam's monetary policy management process.

Tools for implementing Vietnam's monetary policy include open market operations, reserve requirements, interest rate policies, refinancing policies, exchange rate policies and other tools and measures as prescribed by the Government. Open market operations are conducted daily, mainly transactions to buy short-term valuable papers by volume bidding or interest rate bidding. By conducting transactions in both directions of buying and selling valuable papers, open market operations have been effective in regulating the available capital of credit institutions according to the objectives of monetary policy in each period. The volume of open market operations transactions has increased sharply over the years, and the transaction periods have also been increasingly strengthened. Transaction terms have been gradually diversified to suit the needs of the available capital situation of credit institutions and the monetary regulation needs of the State Bank. Open market operations in Vietnam have proven to be a fairly effective tool in monetary policy management when the frequency of using the tool is quite frequent with the number of trading sessions often at a high level. The compulsory reserve tool is used with a lower adjustment frequency, mainly at times when it is necessary to create a difference to avoid hoarding foreign currency (implementing an increase in the compulsory reserve ratio for foreign currency deposits) or support lending to priority sectors (reducing the compulsory reserve ratio for credit institutions with higher lending rates to rural and agricultural areas). Interest rates are also used by the State Bank with operating interest rates including refinancing interest rates, base interest rates and other interest rates such as overnight lending rates in interbank electronic payments, which have also been announced by the State Bank in recent years. In which, the refinancing interest rate and overnight lending interest rate in interbank electronic payments are used more frequently, the base interest rate is mainly used to control usury activities according to the provisions of the 2005 Civil Law. The exchange rate as a tool of monetary policy has been regulated.


established a long time ago and is still used regularly today to regulate supply and demand in the foreign exchange market.

4.3 RESEARCH RESULTS ON THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL INTEGRATION ON MONETARY POLICY INDEPENDENCE IN VIETNAM

4.3.1 Descriptive statistics of variables

Table 4.7 presents the descriptive statistics and Figure 4.16 shows the trends of the variables in the period 2009Q1 – 2019Q2. In which, MI is the independent index of monetary policy, IFI is the level of HNTC, ES is the exchange rate stability index and RES is the foreign exchange reserve ratio.

Table 4.7 Descriptive statistics of variables in the ARDL model



MI

IFI

ES

RES

Medium

0.535561

1.115472

0.865819

0.170416

Median

0.558672

1.077120

0.888494

0.175110

Biggest

0.857464

1.371515

0.980623

0.272721

Smallest

0.079182

0.803677

0.485141

0.091843

Standard error

0.214468

0.174065

0.101982

0.044658

Maybe you are interested!

Evaluating Vietnams Monetary Policy Management Process

Source: Author synthesized results from Eviews10 software


MI

1.0


1.4

IFI


0.8


0.6


0.4


0.2


1.3


1.2


1.1


1.0


0.9


0.8


0.0

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19


0.7


09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19


ES

1.0


.28

RES


0.9 .24


0.8


0.7


0.6


0.5


.20


.16


.12


0.4

09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

.08


09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19


Figure 4.16 Evolution of indicators in the ARDL model during the period 2009Q1 – 2019Q2

Source: Extracted from Eviews10 software


Monetary independence (MI) : Monetary independence in Vietnam averages approximately 0.5 and is unstable throughout the research period. MI was very low from the beginning of the period (just over 0.2), suddenly increased to a very high level in the next quarter and continued to fluctuate throughout the research period and is also the variable with the highest standard error among the four research variables. The level of monetary independence fell to its lowest level in the second quarter of 2013 when the index had not reached 0.1 and has been on a continuous downward trend since 2017, only increasing again in mid-2019 until now.

HNTC (IFI): Vietnam's HNTC level has increased continuously since 2009 until now. From the lowest level of just over 80% at the beginning of the period and the highest level of nearly 140%, the average of the period is over 100%.


Exchange rate stability (ES) : The VND/USD exchange rate remained stable at a very high level throughout the period, averaging 0.86 compared to the maximum within the index band of 1. The exchange rate stability bottomed out in the fourth quarter of 2009 but remained quite high, reaching approximately 0.5.

Foreign exchange reserves (RES): Foreign exchange reserves declined sharply in the early stages of the study with a low of 9.14% of GDP in the fourth quarter of 2011. Since then, RES has been on an upward trend but has been unstable, with sharp declines and is currently at its highest level of 27.27% of GDP.

In general, during the research period, Vietnam had an increasing level of HNTC along with a relatively stable and high exchange rate. In contrast to the increasing and steady trend of the two corners in the Impossible Trinity, monetary independence showed many fluctuations. According to the Impossible Trinity theory, MI should have shown a decreasing trend as a trade-off when the other two corners increased, but in reality, Vietnam did not follow that trend. Looking at the development of foreign exchange reserves during this period, it can be seen that although there was an increasing trend, there were periods of quite large declines. The quarters of decline in foreign exchange reserves seemed to follow the quarters of declining monetary independence. However, with the increasing trend of foreign exchange reserves, monetary independence did not show a clear increase but changed direction very quickly and continuously. To clarify this issue, the study continues to empirically analyze the impact of HNTC, exchange rate stability and foreign exchange reserves on the level of monetary policy independence in the next section.

4.3.2 Unit root test

The unit root test results show that the variables MI and ES are stationary at the original level, while the variables IFI and RES are not stationary at the original level and are stationary at the first difference. According to Pesaran & Shin (1996), for variables that are stationary at different levels, the ARDL method is appropriate.


Table 4.8 Stationarity test results of data series in ARDL model


Variable

Original String

I(0)

First difference series

I(1)

Conclude

MI

-5.529607***


Stop I(0)

IFI

-1.190094

-7.086586***

Stop I(1)

ES

-4.593593***


Stop I(0)

RES

-0.635382

-4.458891***

Stop I(1)

Note: *** corresponds to 1% statistical significance level.

Source: Source: Author synthesized results from Eviews10 software


4.3.3 Determine the optimal delay

The results from Eviews10 show that the optimal lag of the ARDL model is determined respectively with the variables MI IFI ES RES as (1,1,2,0).

4.3.4 Long-term impact estimates

Before considering the estimated coefficients, it is necessary to determine whether there is a cointegrating relationship between the variables through the envelope test method. With the hypothesis H 0 : there is no cointegrating relationship in the model, the alternative hypothesis H 1 : there is a cointegrating relationship in the model.

If the F statistic value is greater than the upper envelope value corresponding to the linkage degree I(1), the hypothesis H0 is rejected, concluding that there is a cointegrating relationship - a long-run relationship between the variables. Conversely, if F is less than the lower envelope value corresponding to the linkage degree I(0), then there is no basis to reject H0 or H1 can be accepted , concluding that the variables do not have a long-run relationship.

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *