Economic component index:
13
I KT 10 I i
i 4
Social composition index:
23
I XH 10 I i
i 14
Resource and environmental component index:
7 I i i 24
30
I MT
b. Average weighted average
The important issue in establishing the weighted average formula is to assign appropriate weights to the individual indicators. The author proposes three formulas corresponding to three main groups of indicators on economy, society and environment. The group of composite indicators has only three indicators, each of which assesses different important aspects of sustainable development, and is considered as three pillars reflecting the synthesis of sustainable development. Therefore, the simple weighted average formula should still be used in calculating the index of this group of composite indicators.
- Economic indicators:
13a
I KT a i I i i
i 4
In which, a i : weight of each indicator in the group of economic indicators
- Social indicators:
23b
I XH b i
I i i
i 14
In which, b i : weight of each indicator in the group of social indicators
- Group of natural resources and environment indicators:
30 c
I MT c i
I i i
i 24
In which, c i : weight of each indicator in the resource indicator group and
environment
The above research overview has introduced different methods for determining weights. In the framework of this research, the author chose to use the semi-matrix method [15]. This is a simple method and is quite effective when taking into account the country's development strategy in each development stage. The process of determining weights is carried out through the following steps:
- Step 1: Create a matrix of the indicators to be compared
- Step 2: Number the comparison criteria in order
- Step 3: Compare each indicator with the remaining indicators in the matrix, the more important indicator is given the indicator number.
- Step 4: Summarize the number of times met, the indicator with the highest number of times met proves it is more important than other indicators.
- Step 5: Assign each indicator a weight corresponding to its importance.
Applying this method in determining the formula for calculating the sustainable development component index, on the basis of current socio-economic theory, the author proposes semi-matrix tables 2.6, 2.7, 2.8.
With this method of determination, each indicator in each indicator group has a different number of encounters. The larger the number of encounters, the more important the role of the indicator in the research indicator group. If the "number of encounters" is used as the weight of each indicator in the calculation formula, it will lead to a large difference between the indicators.
For example, indicator 8 “Renewable energy share in energy use structure” has a weight of 1 while indicator 9 “Consumer price index” has a weight of up to
10. Thus, in each group of indicators, it is necessary to group them according to the number of times they are encountered, creating conditions for determining more meaningful weights. Because the indicators given in the indicator system are all carefully considered, the difference in importance is not large, and in addition, in each group of indicators, there are only 7-10 indicators, so the author will divide each group of indicators into two groups corresponding to weights 1 and 2 in the calculation formula. Specifically in table 2.9.
(i) Economic composition index
Table 2.6. Determining weights for economic indicator groups
Target
(4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | Number of times meet | |
(4) Efficiency of investment capital use | 4 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
(5) Social labor productivity | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 10 | |
(6) Contribution ratio of total factor productivity integrated into the overall growth rate | 6 | 6 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | ||
(7) The reduction in energy consumption to produce a GDP unit | 7 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 2 | |||
(8) The proportion of renewable energy in the energy use structure quantity | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 1 | ||||
(9) Consumer Price Index (CPI ) | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | |||||
(10) Current account balance | 10 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 5 | ||||||
(11) State budget deficit | 11 | 12 | 13 | 3 | |||||||
(12) Government debt | 12 | 13 | 4 | ||||||||
(13) Foreign debt | 13 | 6 | |||||||||
Total | 55 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Group of Indicators for Efficiency of Capital Use in Production and Business -
Group of Indicators Reflecting Factors Affecting Agribank's Agricultural Lending -
Group of Indicators Showing the Impact of Tourism Development on Livelihood Resources -
Method of Determining Some Indicators Reflecting Economic Growth -
Business Performance and Efficiency Indicators Group

(ii) Social composition index
Table 2.7. Determining weights for social indicator groups
Target
(14) | (15) | (16) | (17) | (18) | (19) | (20) | (21) | (22) | (23) | Number meet | |
(14) Poverty rate | 14 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 8 |
(15) Unemployment rate | 15 | 15 | 17 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 9 | |
(16) Proportion of workers working in the economy who have received training | 16 | 17 | 16 | 19 | 16 | 21 | 22 | 16 | 4 | ||
(17) Coefficient of inequality in income distribution | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 10 | |||
(18) Sex ratio at birth | 18 | 19 | 18 | 21 | 22 | 18 | 3 | ||||
(19) Number of students/10,000 population | 19 | 19 | 19 | 22 | 19 | 6 | |||||
(20) Number of Internet subscribers | 20 | 21 | 22 | 20 | 2 | ||||||
(21) Percentage of people receiving social insurance, health insurance, unemployment insurance | 21 | 22 | 21 | 5 | |||||||
(22) Number of people killed in traffic accidents | 22 | 22 | 7 | ||||||||
(23) Percentage of communes recognized as meeting new rural criteria | 23 | 1 | |||||||||
Total | 55 |
(iii) Resource and environmental component index
Table 2.8. Determining weights for groups of indicators on resources and environment
Target
(24) | (25) | (26) | (27) | (28) | (29) | (30) | Number of times meet | |
(24) Forest cover ratio | 24 | 24 | 24 | 27 | 24 | 24 | 24 | 6 |
(25) Percentage of land protected and maintaining biodiversity | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 25 | 2 | |
(26) Area of degraded land | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 26 | 3 | ||
(27) Level of reduction in groundwater and surface water | 27 | 27 | 27 | 27 | 7 | |||
(28) Percentage of days with concentrations of air toxic substances exceeding permissible standards | 28 | 28 | 28 | 5 | ||||
(29) Rate of urban areas, industrial parks, export processing zones, industrial clusters Solid waste and wastewater treatment meet national technical standards or regulations | 29 | 29 | 4 | |||||
(30) Rate of solid waste collected and treated to meet national technical standards and regulations | 30 | 1 | ||||||
Total | 28 |
Table 2.9. Summary table of weights corresponding to each indicator in the sustainable development indicator system
Target
Number of meetings | Number of rights | |
1. General indicators | ||
1. Green GDP | x | 1 |
2. Human Development Index | x | 1 |
3. Environmental sustainability index | x | 1 |
2. Economic indicators | ||
4. Efficiency of investment capital use | 6 | 2 |
5. Social labor productivity | 7 | 2 |
6. Contribution ratio of factor productivity aggregated into overall growth rate | 8 | 2 |
7. Reduction in energy consumption to produce one unit of GDP | 2 | 1 |
8. Proportion of renewable energy in the usage structure energy | 1 | 1 |
9. Consumer Price Index (CPI) | 10 | 2 |
10. Current account balance | 5 | 1 |
11. State budget deficit | 3 | 1 |
12. Government Debt | 4 | 1 |
13. Foreign debt | 9 | 2 |
3. Social indicators | ||
14. Poverty rate | 7 | 2 |
15. Unemployment rate | 9 | 2 |
16. The proportion of workers employed in the economy trained | 4 | 1 |
17. Coefficient of inequality in income distribution input (Gini coefficient) | 10 | 2 |
18. Sex ratio at birth | 3 | 1 |
19. Number of students/10,000 population | 8 | 2 |
Target
Number of meetings | Number of rights | |
20. Number of Internet subscribers | 2 | 1 |
21. Percentage of people receiving social insurance association, health insurance, unemployment insurance | 5 | 1 |
22. Number of people killed in traffic accidents | 6 | 2 |
23. Percentage of communes recognized as meeting rural criteria new village | 1 | 1 |
4. Resources and environmental indicators | ||
24. Forest cover ratio | 6 | 2 |
25. Percentage of land protected and maintaining biodiversity learn | 2 | 1 |
26. Area of degraded land | 3 | 2 |
27. Reduction in groundwater and surface water | 7 | 2 |
28. Percentage of days with concentrations of toxic substances air exceeds permissible standards | 5 | 1 |
29. Rate of urban areas, industrial parks, and export processing zones that treat solid waste and wastewater to standards or corresponding national technical regulations | 4 | 1 |
30. Rate of solid waste collected and treated to meet standards corresponding national technical standards and regulations | 1 | 1 |
(Source: Author's analysis)
From the above analysis, the sustainable development component index is calculated according to the geometric mean formula as follows:
Index of the group of composite indicators:
I TH
Economic component index:
3 I 1 I 2 I 3
13a
I KT
15 I i i
i 4
economy
In which, a i : weight corresponding to indicator I i in the indicator group
Social composition index:
23b
I XH 15 I i i
i 14
festival
In which, b i : weight corresponding to indicator I i in the group of social indicators
Resource and environmental component index:
30 c
I MT 10 I i i
i 24
In which, c i : weight corresponding to indicator I i in the group of natural resources and environment indicators
2.2.3. Formula for calculating the sustainable development composite index
The system of sustainable development statistical indicators consists of four groups of indicators: economic, social, environmental resources and composite indicators. The composite sustainable development index will be calculated from these four component indicators. The formula is still based on the principle of calculating the average number. However, in this case, it is necessary to decide whether to use the weighted average formula or not.
According to the content of sustainable development as well as the development perspective of Vietnam, sustainable development is the balanced and harmonious development between the three economic, social and environmental fields, without neglecting any field. Therefore, the contribution of these fields to the development process is the same. In addition, the system of sustainable development statistical indicators has an additional group of synthetic indicators including three indicators to evaluate the overall development process through economic - social - environmental relationships. Because the fields have the same role in sustainable development, the group of synthetic indicators will also play an important role like other groups of indicators.
From there, the author chooses the simple geometric mean formula (unweighted) to calculate the sustainable development index. This is a calculation method that ensures the content and meaning of sustainable development and is easy to implement.





