Compensation Price List for Land Leveling and Other Equipment Appendix 2.3: Compensation Price List for Crops

Point b Clause 2, Clause 4 Article 2 Decision No. 58/QD-UBND dated January 12, 2015 of the City People's Committee, specifically as follows:

- For perennial trees: Trees at harvest time: support 30% of the price according to the Unit Price List and transportation costs equal to 10% of the price; Trees not yet at harvest time: compensation 100% of the price according to the Unit Price List.

- Annual trees: Compensation for annual trees is calculated at 100% of the price according to the unit price list. Annual trees planted in excess of the density specified in the unit price list are supported as follows: Trees planted densely or arranged densely exceeding the normal density of over 100% of the prescribed density: support for moving costs is equal to 10% of the price of that tree.

- Ornamental plants: Do not move, 100% compensation; Moving is supported for damage up to 30% of the price; Plants in pots (including pots buried underground), hanging baskets: support for actual moving costs but not exceeding 15% of the price; Ornamental plants grown not for living purposes but for business purposes: support 30% of the price (due to early consumption reducing value or damage during moving).

Appendix 2.1: Regulations on compensation price list for houses

Appendix 2.2: Set of unit prices for compensation for site clearance and other equipment Appendix 2.3: Set of prices for compensation for crops

Compensation for property damage on project land, specifically as follows:

Table 2.8: Summary of compensation costs for property damage on land

Target	Hoang Van Thu Bridge Project
Target	Qualified for BTHT (case)	Compensation support amount (Billion VND)
1	BTHT for residential and public works architecture	34	96,648
2	Other support (trees, crops, pets from the family garden)	30	6,913
Total		-	103,561

Maybe you are interested!

(Source: Compensation and support board for land clearance in Hong Bang district, Hai Phong city in 2018)

Comment: Through Table 2.8, we can see that the compensation for assets on land at the project is carried out on the basis of compensation for architectural works on land and compensation for trees, crops, and livestock from the family garden, in which the compensation amount for construction works is

The architecture is mainly on land because the construction project is mainly on residential land, with the compensation amount of 96,648 billion VND.

2.4.1.6. Status of implementation of support policies at the project

- Support for relocation: Households and individuals whose land is recovered and must relocate will receive additional support to stabilize their lives in cash for the actual members currently living at the land recovery site. The time and level of support are specified as follows: Support period is 06 months for cases of complete house demolition and 03 months for cases of partial house demolition; The level of support in cash for one member/month is equivalent to 30kg of rice according to the price announced annually by the Department of Finance.

- Support for renting houses and temporary housing locations:

+ Owners of houses and residential land that are recovered and meet resettlement standards but the investor has not yet arranged them in resettlement areas according to regulations or in the City's temporary housing fund, if they voluntarily hand over the site on schedule and take care of their own temporary housing, they will be supported with temporary housing rent; The support period is calculated from the time of handing over the site to the time of receiving the resettlement house (in case of purchasing a resettlement house); or until the time of receiving the resettlement land notice plus 06 months to build a house (in case of being assigned resettlement land).

+ In case of partial land recovery, land that does not meet resettlement standards but in reality the entire or part of the house is demolished, if the site is handed over on schedule, temporary housing rent support will be provided for 6 months in case of total house demolition; for 3 months in case of partial house demolition.

+ In case of being eligible for resettlement arrangement but voluntarily handing over the site and arranging temporary accommodation, they will also receive additional support for moving the house and structures to the temporary accommodation of 5,000,000 VND/house and land user.

- Production and business support

Economic organizations, households and individuals who are currently engaged in production and business or renting out production and business locations with business registration and have fulfilled financial obligations to the State and whose houses and land in use are all (or part) recovered and production and business are suspended shall be supported with 30% of their after-tax income in one year according to the average income of the three previous consecutive years confirmed by the Tax authority; In case the business period is less than three years, the average shall be calculated based on the actual business period.

Table 2.9: Support policies at the project

Support form	Review content
Support form	Support costs	Total amount (billion VND)
1	Support for moving house and belongings architecture	5,000,000 VND/household	1.5
2	Cash support for each person	3,000,000 VND/person	0.8
3	Temporary migration support	12,000,000 VND/household	0.3
4	Support money to stabilize life	6,000,000 VND/household	0.2
5	Support stable production and business	96,235,000 VND/organization	3.7
Total		-	6.9

(Source: People's Committee of Hong Bang district, Hai Phong city in 2019)

Comments: Through Table 2.9, we can see that the policies for stabilizing life applied at the Hoang Van Thu bridge project include: Support for moving house; Support for temporary residence during the time of receiving resettlement land; Support for stabilizing life for each person and household. The amount of money spent on each household is in accordance with the direction of the City People's Committee. The amount of money spent is not large, but it has partly supported the immediate difficulties of households before entering the new resettlement area.

2.4.1.7. Status of resettlement implementation

The number of households that had to relocate was carried out as planned in the project, which was 31 households. It can be said that the planning and statistics of households that had to be relocated were carried out quite well, ensuring the progress of the project, as well as the site clearance work directed by the City People's Committee. To do this, it is the effort of all levels, sectors, and functional departments working together to implement.

Table 2.10 : Resettlement arrangement of the project

Resettlement area	Number of resettlement land plots (Household)	Area type (m 2 )
1	Lot 1	15	40-50
2	Lot 2	16	51-70
Total		31	-

(Source: Compensation and support board for land clearance in Hong Bang district, Hai Phong city in 2018)

Comment: Through table 2.10, we can see that the resettlement arrangement of the project is carried out according to each plot of land (plot 40-50m2 and lot 51-70m2) in So Dau ward. The resettlement area has a station, school, and convenient traffic to ensure the people's daily life. Number

The population is arranged in plots of land of different areas based on the area of land recovered, family status, consideration of families with revolutionary contributions... to arrange appropriately.

According to the report of the District Land Fund Development Center, by the end of 2017, households had drawn lots for resettlement land plots and the number of households that had received decisions on resettlement land allocation was 31 households, reaching 100%. It can be said that the District People's Committee has done a good job of resettlement for households subject to land recovery, ensuring early stabilization of people's lives.

2.4.1.8.Synthesize opinions on the project from households whose land was recovered

To survey people's opinions on compensation and resettlement work at Hoang Van Thu bridge project, questionnaires were distributed to all households whose land was recovered with a total of 31 ballots. The results of the people's opinions on compensation and resettlement policy at the project are presented in Table 2.11.

Table 2.11: People's opinions on compensation and support policies at the project

Review content	Hoang Van Thu Bridge Project
Review content	SL (votes)	Rate (%)
1	Is the land compensation price consistent with the market price at the time of land acquisition?	31	100
1.1	Reasonable	25	80.6
1.2	Not reasonable	6	19.3
2	Is the compensation level for property attached to land appropriate?	31	100
2.1	Fit	24	77.4
2.2	Not suitable	7	22.6
3	Are compensation and support payments made on time?	31	100
3.1	On time	26	83.8
3.2	Not on time	5	16, 2
4	Is the level of support for stabilizing life reasonable?	31	100
4.1	Reasonable	23	74.2
4.2	Unreasonable	8	25.8
5	Is the level of temporary housing support reasonable?	31	100
5.1	Reasonable	25	80.6
5.2	Unreasonable	6	19.3

(Source: Survey results, 2019)

Comments: Table 2.11 summarizes people's opinions on the project's compensation policy. Through actual data collected from the survey of 31 households directly affected by the project, the rate of people agreeing with the project's compensation policy is quite high, from 74.2% - 83.8%. The opinion with the highest rate of agreement is that the compensation money is paid on time (reaching 83.8% of the total number of votes collected). Through actual research at some households such as the families of Mr. Luong Khanh Thien, Duong Khac Hoa; Pham Quang Ly, it is known that in order to pay compensation, the District People's Committee held a meeting with the people; publicly announced the compensation level and compensation time, with a clear legal basis and compensation level, so basically all compensation amounts are guaranteed within the prescribed time. However, for some criteria such as the criteria on the level of support for stabilizing life, there are still many opinions that are unreasonable (This rate accounts for 25.8% of the total votes received). In addition, the compensation price and the resettlement plan still have many opinions that are quite high (22.6%). Through practical research, the price applied by the state for the project is still low compared to the market price and the support level for resettlement only meets the minimum requirements for households subject to resettlement but cannot completely restore the people's living standards as before. Therefore, in the coming period, the District People's Committee needs to study and take measures to overcome these limitations, to ensure that people can work and produce with peace of mind and stabilize their housing.

Summary of comments on resettlement policy is shown in the following table:

Comments: Through the synthesis of people's opinions on the resettlement policy applied at the project in Table 2.12, it can be seen that the organization of the lottery for resettlement land, the consultation on the area, living environment of resettlement land, infrastructure, and construction quality at the resettlement land were agreed by the majority of people with a high consensus rate. However, regarding the resettlement price policy, the consensus rate was only 67.7%, which was considered reasonable, while 32.3% thought it was not reasonable, high compared to the specific land price received at the recovery location. Regarding the location of the resettlement area, 70.9% thought it was appropriate, but 29.1% thought it was not appropriate, and the resettlement land allocation work was delayed, leading to 38.7% of the votes saying it was not on time. From the results of this opinion synthesis, it can be seen that the resettlement policy needs to continue to be improved to ensure the lives of people at the resettlement area of the project.

Table 2.12: People's opinions on resettlement policies at the project

Review content	Hoang Van Thu Bridge Project
Review content	SL (votes)	Rate (%)
1	Is the resettlement land price at the project reasonable?	31	100
1.1	Reasonable	21	67.7
1.2	Not reasonable	10	32.3
2	Is the location of the resettlement area suitable?	31	100
2.1	Fit	22	70.9
2.2	Not suitable	9	29.1
3	Is the organization of the land draw for resettlement fair?	31	100
3.1	Fair	30	96.8
3.2	Not fair	1	3.2
4	Is the resettlement land allocation work carried out on time?	31	100
4.1	On time	19	61.3
4.2	Not on time	12	38.7
5	Are resettled people consulted about area and environment? life of the land or not?	31	100
5.1	Referred	28	90.3
5.2	No solicitation	3	9.7
6	Does the resettlement area ensure infrastructure and construction quality?	31	100
6.1	Ensure	29	93.5
6.2	No guarantee	2	6.5

(Source: Survey results, 2019)

Table 2.13: General assessment of people on the project's resettlement and compensation work

Review content	Hoang Van Thu Bridge Project
Review content	SL (votes)	Rate (%)
1	The land acquisition area is carried out in accordance with the project's planning boundary.	31	100
1.1	Correct	31	100.0
1.2	Incorrect	0	0.0
2	Compliance with democratic and public principles in site clearance at the project	31	100
2.1	Follow	29	93.5
2.2	Not in compliance	2	6.5
3	Has the implementation of the responsibilities of the Project Compensation and Site Clearance Board been appropriate?	31	100
3.1	Fit	28	90.3
3.2	Not suitable	3	9.7
4	Can people whose land is recovered participate in giving opinions on the compensation and resettlement plan?	31	100
4.1	Get involved	31	100.0
4.2	Not allowed to participate	0	0.0
5	Overall assessment of the project's compensation and resettlement policy is appropriate?	31	100
5.1	Fit	23	74.2
5.2	Not suitable	8	25.8

(Source: Survey results, 2019)

Comments: Through table 2.13, we can see that: the general opinions of the people about the project's compensation and resettlement work focus on the survey contents such as: The area of recovered land is implemented in accordance with the project's planning boundary; Compliance with the principles of democracy and transparency in compensation and resettlement at the project; Is the implementation of the responsibilities of the project's Compensation and Resettlement Board appropriate? Are people whose land is recovered allowed to give opinions on the compensation and resettlement plan? Is the general assessment of the project's compensation and resettlement policy appropriate? The opinions that agree with the absolute number of votes such as: The area of recovered land is implemented in accordance with the planning boundary

Project plan; People whose land is recovered are allowed to give their opinions on the compensation and resettlement plan (The approval rate reached 100% of the total votes collected). This demonstrates transparency as well as the land recovered being implemented in accordance with the planning of the City People's Committee. People affected by the project are invited to attend meetings and have the right to supervise the implementation of their own recovered land. However, the compensation and resettlement policies of the project still follow the Government's items, so the policies are still low compared to the needs of local people, so there are still inappropriate opinions (This rate is 25.8% of the total votes collected). In the coming time, the District People's Committee needs to take more timely steps to adjust and support to reduce this rate, ensuring people's lives.

In addition, for the question: Could you please tell me what issues do people in the project write petitions and complaints about the most during the process of Land Acquisition, Compensation and Resettlement? Through the synthesis of survey forms, it shows that: Information on compensation rates, compensated subjects, information on the project and detailed planning are always considered the most important information. In particular, for people, what they care about most is the compensation rate because it is directly related to the legitimate interests of the people. Therefore, many opinions said that the issues of questions and complaints at the project mainly focus on the compensation rate for land and assets and architectural works on the land.

2.4.2. Assessment of the current status of land acquisition, compensation, support and resettlement of Vinhomes Imperia Urban Area Project (formerly known as Xi Mang Urban Area Project), Thuong Ly Ward, Hong Bang District, Hai Phong City

2.4.2.1. General overview of Vinhomes Imperia urban area project, Thuong Ly ward, Hong Bang district, Hai Phong city

Vinhomes Imperial Urban Area Project is a project transferred from Hai Phong Cement Urban Area Project, planned from February 1, 2010 with a total project area of 78.5 hectares. From 2010 to March 2015, Vicem - Hai Phong Cement Urban Area Joint Stock Company newly acquired the area of the old cement factory (58.25 hectares), after that the Company encountered financial difficulties and was unable to implement the project. On March 6, 2015, the Prime Minister issued Conclusion Notice No. 72/TB-