76
Table 2.1. Capital usage structure and deviation of asset proportions compared to previous year of Vietinbank
Unit: billion VND
Target
Year 2008 | Year 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
1. Fund | 14,029 | 13,191 | 13,628 | 20,569 | 29,221 | 25,577 | 27,433 | 32,669 | 58,844 |
Proportion (%) | 7.17 | 5.38 | 3.68 | 4.44 | 5.76 | 4.41 | 4.12 | 4.18 | 6.2 |
Proportional deviation (%) | - | -1.79 | -1.7 | +0.76 | +1.32 | -1.35 | -0.29 | +0.06 | +2.02 |
2. Term deposits and loans Other credit institutions | 12,235 | 18,428 | 45,183 | 60,514 | 43,233 | 60,496 | 62508 | 50,333 | 54,315 |
Proportion (%) | 6.25 | 7.51 | 12.19 | 13.05 | 8.53 | 10.43 | 9.38 | 6.46 | 5.73 |
Proportional deviation (%) | - | +1.26 | +4.68 | +0.86 | -4.52 | +1.9 | -1.05 | -2.92 | -0.73 |
3. Customer loans | 120,752 | 163,170 | 234,205 | 293,434 | 333,356 | 376,289 | 435,503 | 533,530 | 655.126 |
Proportion (%) | 61.68 | 66.51 | 63.17 | 63.28 | 65.74 | 64.90 | 66.03 | 68.45 | 69.05 |
Proportional deviation (%) | - | +4.83 | -3.34 | +0.11 | +2.46 | -0.84 | +1.13 | +2.42 | +0.6 |
4. Investing and trading in securities and joint venture | 42,751 | 40,818 | 64,197 | 71,223 | 76,706 | 87,073 | 101,487 | 127,263 | 140,007 |
Proportion (%) | 21.84 | 16.64 | 17.32 | 15.36 | 15.13 | 15.02 | 15.24 | 16.33 | 14.76 |
Proportional deviation (%) | - | -5.2 | +0.68 | -1.96 | -0.23 | -0.11 | +0.22 | +1.09 | -1.57 |
5. Other assets | 6.015 | 9,733 | 13,544 | 18,003 | 24,534 | 30,373 | 34,830 | 35,688 | 40,407 |
Proportion (%) | 3.06 | 3.97 | 3.65 | 3.87 | 4.84 | 5.24 | 5.23 | 4.58 | 4.26 |
Proportional deviation (%) | - | +0.91 | -0.32 | +0.22 | +0.97 | +0.4 | -0.01 | -0.65 | -0.32 |
Interest receivable | 2,416 | 2,699 | 4,886 | 6.665 | 7,944 | 10,036 | 12,756 | 12,864 | 14,208 |
Total assets | 195,782 | 245,340 | 370,758 | 463,743 | 507,050 | 579,808 | 661,761 | 779,483 | 948,699 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Shifting capital structure at Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade - 17 -
Organizational Structure of Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Foreign Trade of Vietnam - Bac Ninh Branch -
Increasing capital mobilization from individual customers of commercial banks - Case study of Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Investment and Development, Phu Tho Branch - 1 -
Solutions to enhance capital mobilization at Lien Viet Post Joint Stock Commercial Bank - Hai Phong Branch - 9 -
Completing the appraisal of loans for additional working capital for corporate customers at Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade - Dong Anh Branch - 5

Source: [59] and NCS's calculation
Since 2009, Vietnam has been significantly affected by the impacts of the global financial and monetary crisis, the economy has fallen into deflation, the State Bank has operated monetary policy in a loose direction, the reserve requirement ratio for VND mobilized capital has remained stable up to now at 3% for term deposits and term deposits under 12 months, 1% for term deposits over 12 months, the proportion of treasury value at Vietinbank has decreased. In 2009-2010, the deviation of the proportion of treasury value with the corresponding year was -2.14% and -1.72%. In 2011-2015, the proportion of treasury value of the Bank was quite stable (low annual deviation). By 2016, the treasury value accounted for 6.2% with a large deviation of +2.02% compared to 2015, due to the shift from the value of liquid securities.
* Term deposits and loans to other credit institutions:
According to Circular 04/2003/NHNN and Circular 23/2013/NHNN replacing Circular 04/2013, the State Bank stipulates: State-owned credit institutions including Vietinbank, Agribank, Vietcombank, BIDV are responsible for maintaining the deposit balance at the Social Policy Bank equal to 2% of the VND NVHĐ balance (including deposits and issued GTCG) at December 31 of the previous year. Thus, in the value of term deposits and loans to other credit institutions including term deposits at the Social Policy Bank, it is considered a mandatory deposit and is paid low interest (equal to the average capital mobilization interest rate of State-owned credit institutions + capital mobilization fee but maximum is 1.35%/year)
On the TTNL, Vietinbank is considered an active participant. In 2008, term deposits and loans to other credit institutions accounted for only 6.25%, but from 2009 to 2011, the value proportion of this item increased compared to the previous year, accounting for 7.51%, 12.19% and 13.05% of total assets, respectively, leading to deviations in the proportion of capital allocated to this activity of +1.26%, +4.68%, +0.86% respectively. According to the 2013 report of the National Financial Supervisory Commission, the proportion of deposits and loans in the secondary market in the Vietnamese commercial banking system is higher than in many countries in the world, the average of the whole system is at 17%, while in Asian countries it is about 10%. Thus, compared to other Vietnamese commercial banks, Vietinbank's loan capital ratio in market 2 is at an average level, only accounting for a high proportion in 2010-2011, which was also the year when many Vietnamese commercial banks lacked available capital. This activity helps the Bank diversify its capital usage forms, increasing the profitability of its assets.
The proportion of VietinBank's term deposits and loans in the market decreased sharply in 2012 (the proportion deviation was -4.52% compared to 2011), continued to decrease from 2014 to 2016, at the end of 2016 the proportion of this item accounted for only 5.73%. The main reason is due to the strict regulations of the State Bank on activities in this market: According to Circular No. 21/2012/NHNN regulating borrowing, lending and term trading of GTCG between credit institutions (effective from September 1, 2012), credit institutions are not allowed to deposit or receive deposits (except for TGTT) at/of other credit institutions. Lending and borrowing activities in the market are only carried out through the head office of the credit institution, the transaction period is only carried out in the short term of less than 1 year. The elimination of T-DH transactions on the interbank market limits the situation of commercial banks increasing virtual assets due to participation in this market. Along with that, the available capital of other credit institutions has begun to be redundant, so it also reduces the demand for transactions, leading to a decrease in the proportion of lending capital on the interbank market of the Bank.
* Loans to customers:
If in 2005, the ratio of outstanding loans/Total assets of Vietinbank was above 75% [58], then in the period 2008-2016 it only fluctuated from 62-69%. Notably, in 2008, the lowest customer loan ratio was only 61.68% due to the shift of capital to investment and lending activities on the interbank market. From 2012-2016, the ratio of outstanding loans to customers tended to increase, in 2016 it was at 69.05% of total assets.
The data on the deviation of the proportion of outstanding loans at the Bank shows that: in the period of 2008-2016, the proportion of outstanding loans at the Bank mainly increased slightly, except in 2010 and 2013, which decreased by -3.34% and -0.84%, respectively. These fluctuations were mainly due to the shift between profit-making activities: lending and investment. The demand and ability to absorb capital in the economy were better, the market interest rate remained low and quite stable from 2015-2016, in the condition that the capital mobilization channel of enterprises on the stock market was still limited, mainly depending on the bank credit channel, leading to the proportion of outstanding loans at VietinBank in particular and the whole system in general, which has grown again.
* Trading, investing in stocks and other long-term investments:
In 2008, the proportion of capital investment for this activity accounted for nearly 22%. In the following years, the proportion of capital investment for this activity decreased significantly and fluctuated.
about 15%-16%. The reason for the high investment capital ratio in 2008 was mainly because the State Bank issued compulsory treasury bills for Vietinbank and other commercial banks to buy in order to achieve the goal of controlling inflation. The value of treasury bills held by Vietinbank in 2008 was VND 9,509 billion, accounting for 22.3% of the total investment value. From 2009-2013, the investment value ratio mainly decreased, with the sharpest decrease in 2009 (proportion deviation -5.2%), mainly due to the amount of treasury bills paid by the State Bank. In 2014-2015, the investment value ratio increased slightly (proportion deviation +0.22%, +1.09%) due to the shift from lending activities on the interbank market, and at the same time due to the holding of a certain amount of special government bonds when selling bad debts to VAMC. In 2016, the proportion of investment capital decreased, mainly shifting to treasury activities and customer loans.
* Other assets:
The proportion of other assets of Vietinbank also changed significantly and tended to increase in the 3 years 2011-2013, highest in 2013 accounting for 5.24% of total assets, with a slight decrease from 2014-2016.
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2.13
2.5
1.75
1.92
1.81
1.67
2
1.37
1.21
1.42
1.57
1.5
12,756
12,864
14,208
1
7,944
10,035
0.5
2,416
2,699
0
Year Year Year Year Year Year Year Year 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Estimated profit (billion VND)
Proportion of expected profit/Total profitable assets (%)
6.665
4,886
Source: [59] and NCS's calculation
Chart 2.8. Interest receivable and ratio of interest receivable/total profitable assets
Figure 2.8 shows the value of interest receivable and the ratio of interest receivable/total profitable assets at Vietinbank. While the ratio of other items/total assets fluctuated little, the value of interest receivable at the Bank increased, the ratio of expected interest receivable/total profitable assets was highest in 2014 at 2.13%. This situation also reflects the difficulties in debt collection and shortcomings.
in debt classification at the Bank. The problem arises: when interest receivable increases, the Bank's revenue increases, causing the profit target to increase, but the collected money does not increase. This reality occurs not only at Vietinbank but at all commercial banks in Vietnam - is one of the reasons explaining the difficult situation of banks at the time of deciding to pay dividends to shareholders due to lack of funds available to pay dividends, many banks have to pay dividends to shareholders in shares in addition to the goal of increasing charter capital.
(2) Coefficients and rates of capital structure conversion by activity
To more clearly quantify the scale of capital structure shift according to activities at VietinBank between years, NCS calculated the Dm hd index and K hd coefficient for the period 2008-2016 (Table 2.2)
Table 2.2. Coefficients and ratios of capital structure conversion at VietinBank
Year
N08-09 | N09-10 | N10-11 | N11-12 | N12-13 | N13-14 | N14-15 | N15-16 | |
Dm h | 0.00584 | 0.00712 | 0.00099 | 0.00536 | 0.001701 | 0.00033 | 0.00276 | 0.00243 |
Contract (% ) | 6.4 | 5.16 | 2.18 | 4.83 | 2.27 | 1.18 | 3.04 | 2.44 |
Source: Table 2.1 and calculations of the researcher
The coefficient of capital use structure shift Dm hđ in the years is insignificant. The index of Xdm hđ from 2008-2016 is 0.003314. Thus, in 2009, 2010, 2012, Dm hđ is larger than Xdm hđ, proving that the capital use structure according to activities at Vietinbank has shifted greatly in these years. When calculating the ratio of capital use shift , although the measurement data is not consistent in all years, it basically reflects the level of capital use structure shift quite consistent with the coefficient of capital use . Specifically, in 2008-2009, the value of cosФ = 5.7621, corresponding to the ratio of capital use of 6.4%; In 2009-2010, the value of cosФ = 4.646 corresponds to the operating rate of 5.16%, in 2011-2012, the value of cosФ = 4.3434 corresponds to the operating rate of 4.83%.
In the remaining years of the research period, the index Dm hđ < Xdm hđ shows that the capital structure at the Bank has not changed significantly, the scale of change is lowest in 2014 with the coefficient Dm hđ = 0.00033 followed by 2011 with Dm hđ = 0.00099. The years of high K hđ at VietinBank are due to the fluctuation in the proportion of most asset items. The proportion of treasury value decreased from 7.17% in 2008 to 3.68% in 2010. Similar to the value of deposits and
Lending on TTLNH also has a large change in proportion, in 2008 it accounted for 6.25%, in 2010 it accounted for 12.19% of total assets. Meanwhile, in 2011 and the period from 2013 to 2016, K hng at Vietinbank was low, respectively: 2.18%, 2.27%, 1.18%, 3.04% and 2.44%. This result is consistent with the result of the Dm hng indicator analyzed above.
Through the indicators of capital structure by activity, deviation of item proportions, coefficients and conversion ratios (Dm hđ , K hđ ), it can be seen that: From 2008-2012, the capital structure by activity at the Bank shifted significantly. This was also the period when the macroeconomic situation was complicated, the Vietnamese financial market was greatly affected by domestic and foreign instability, and many Vietnamese commercial banks lacked available capital. The capital structure by activity at Vietinbank was affected by monetary policy management tools and market adjustment measures of the State Bank. Along with that, Vietinbank proactively shifted its activities from market 1 to market 2 to increase the profitability of business capital during the period when the demand for available capital of other credit institutions increased. During the period 2013-2016 when the currency value was stable, the shift in capital structure according to activities at Vietinbank was insignificant.
2.2.1.2. Shifting the capital structure within each activity
(1) Shifting the treasury structure
The treasury structure and deviation of the proportion of treasury items at Vietinbank in 2008-2016 are reflected in Table 2.3.
* Budget structure and deviation of proportion of each budget item
Monthly, at the ALCO Committee meeting, the capital balance and liquidity are the main topics discussed. Based on the analysis and assessment, the ALCO Committee makes recommendations to the Board of Directors and the Executive Board for timely guidance to ensure the maintenance of liquidity. The treasury is the primary reserve of commercial banks. At Vietinbank, it is mainly maintained in the general account at the State Bank and other credit institutions.
82
Table 2.3. Treasury structure and deviation of item proportions compared to previous year at Vietinbank
Unit: billion VND
Target
Year 2008 | Year 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
Fund value | 14,029 | 13,191 | 13,628 | 20,569 | 29,221 | 25,577 | 27,433 | 32,669 | 58,844 |
1. Cash and gold | 1,980 | 2.204 | 2,814 | 3,714 | 2,511 | 2,833 | 4,631 | 5,091 | 5,187 |
- Proportion (%) | 14.11 | 16.71 | 20.65 | 18.06 | 8.59 | 11.08 | 16.88 | 15.58 | 8.82% |
- Proportion deviation (%) | - | +2.6 | +3.94 | -2.59 | -9.47 | +2.49 | +5.8 | -1.3 | -6.76 |
2. State Bank deposits | 6.011 | 5,369 | 5,037 | 12.101 | 12,234 | 10,160 | 9,876 | 11,893 | 13,503 |
- Proportion (%) | 42.84 | 40.7 | 36.96 | 58.83 | 41.87 | 39.72 | 36 | 36.4 | 22.95 |
- Proportion deviation (%) | - | -2.14 | -3.74 | +21.87 | - 16.96 | -2.15 | -3.72 | +0.40 | -13.45 |
3. KKH deposits at other credit institutions | 6,038 | 5,618 | 5,778 | 4,754 | 14,476 | 12,584 | 12,926 | 15,686 | 40,154 |
- Proportion (%) | 43.05 | 42.59 | 42.39 | 23.11 | 49.54 | 42.9 | 47.12 | 48.02 | 68.23 |
- Proportion deviation (%) | - | -0.46 | -0.2 | -19.28 | +26.43 | -0.34 | -2.08 | +0.90 | +20.21 |
Source: [59] and NCS's calculation
According to the SBV's Regulation on Deposit Provisions, credit institutions must maintain deposit provisions on their temporary deposits at the SBV according to the principle that the average balance of the temporary deposits account during the period of deposit provision maintenance must not be lower than the deposit provision during the period. Vietinbank, as well as other credit institutions, usually maintain the balance in the temporary deposits account at the SBV just enough for the required deposit provision. Cash at the Bank accounts for a low proportion of the treasury value. Meanwhile, the proportion of temporary deposits at other credit institutions accounts for a fairly high proportion and increased sharply in 2016 to 68.23%. Compared to the list of other forms of capital use, the deviation in the proportion of treasury items between years is very large, which also comes from the characteristics of this type of asset - high liquidity.
In 2008-2010, the deviation in the proportion of treasury items was not large, the shift was mainly from deposits at the State Bank to cash because since 2009, the State Bank has adjusted down the reserve requirement ratio. In 2011, the deviation in the proportion of current accounts at the State Bank was
+21.89%, due to the SBV increasing the reserve requirement ratio for customer deposits in foreign currencies (4% at the end of 2010, 8% at the end of 2011). The high value of deposits at the SBV also reflects that the value of mobilized capital of the Bank in 2011 was still mainly short-term, leading to a decrease in the proportion of cash and current assets at other credit institutions, mainly due to a decrease in the proportion of current assets at other credit institutions (-19.28%). In 2012, the change in treasury structure took place in the opposite direction: the deviation of deposit proportion at the State Bank was -19.96%, combined with the deviation of cash proportion at the treasury of -9.47%, leading to the deviation of current account proportion at other credit institutions of +26.43% compared to 2011. The treasury structure in 2013-2015 did not have a large shift, the value proportion of items was quite stable between years. In 2016, the treasury structure fluctuated strongly in the direction of reducing the proportion of cash with a deviation of (-6.76%), deposits at the State Bank (-13.45%), increasing current account proportion at other credit institutions with a deviation of +20.21%.
* Coefficient and ratio of fund structure transformation (Dm nq and K nq )
The level of fund structure transformation at Vietinbank during the research period through the coefficient Dm nq and the ratio K nq is reflected in Table 2.4.
Table 2.4 . Coefficient Dm nq and rate of fund structure shift K nq
Year
N08-09 | N09-10 | N10-11 | N11-12 | N12-13 | N13-14 | N14-15 | N15-16 | |
Fuck you | 0.00122 | 0.00265 | 0.0474 | 0.07449 | 0.00168 | 0.00665 | 0.00027 | 0.03632 |
K nq (%) | 3.31 | 5.54 | 29.36 | 32.18 | 3.01 | 6.82 | 1.56 | 21.91 |
Source: Table 2.3 and calculations of the researcher
The coefficient of Dm nq in the years is very large, the average of Xdm nq in the period 2008-2016 is 0.02133 , so the coefficient of Dm nq in 2011, 2012, 2016 is much larger than Xdm nq in the whole period, K nq in these years are 29.36%, 32.18% and 21.91% respectively. Meanwhile, from 2013-2015, the Dm nq index is very low compared to Xdm nq in the whole period and tends to decrease gradually, shown through the shift rate between the years from 2013-2015 is 3.01%, 6.82% and 1.56% respectively.
Thus, it can be seen that the treasury structure at Vietinbank during the research period has fluctuated strongly. In terms of nature, this is the most liquid item on the balance sheet, so the conversion between items will be easier. The large shift is mainly due to the impact of the adjustment of the SBV's reserve ratio, which has affected the transfer between cash and temporary deposits at the SBV and at other credit institutions. In addition, one of the reasons that greatly affects the decreasing trend of cash ratio is the innovation in Vietinbank's capital management mechanism implemented since April 2011: implementing the transition from the deposit - lending mechanism to the capital buying - selling mechanism (centralized capital management mechanism FTP - Fund Transfer Pricing). Along with the establishment of the VietinBank Payment Center since October 2014, a model for centralized management and processing of money transfer transactions has been successfully built. Up to now, all money transfer transactions from the LNH payment system and bilateral payment system have been processed centrally at the Center, contributing to reducing the proportion of cash in the total value of the Bank's treasury.
(2) Shifting the lending structure at Vietinbank
In Vietinbank's business strategy, lending is identified as the core business activity [63]. The Bank's risk management work is gradually being innovated and
completed. Before 2013, Vietinbank's lending strategy and risk management strategy were not comprehensive. Because in the T-DH strategy or annual development strategy, although some contents such as: loan structure by term, customer target, growth rate,... were mentioned, they were only principles and orientations. Since December 2012, Vietinbank has issued documents detailing lending limits, acceptable risk levels (risk appetite). Decision 769/QD-HDQT-NHCT35 issued on June 5, 2013 and currently Decision 532/2016/QD-HDQT-NHCT9 specifically stipulate the risk management organization model; risk management steps (at the portfolio and transaction levels); policy system and information technology infrastructure supporting risk management.
Since 2013, Vietinbank has controlled and managed RRTD by setting limits corresponding to the risk limits that the Bank sets for each customer and each sector. Decision 1867/2012/HĐQT-NHCT35, dated November 29, 2012, regulating lending limits is the basis for forming and adjusting the lending structure.
Table 2.5. Loan limits at Vietinbank
STT
Target | Credit limit | |
1 | Credit concentration for 1 customer | Up to 15% equity |
2 | The level of credit concentration for one customer and person concerned | Up to 25% equity |
3 | Level of concentration on large customer groups | Up to 40% equity |
4 | Level of concentration on unsecured debt | Up to 15% of total outstanding balance |
5 | Concentration by customer class | |
Customers from class A and above | Minimum 94% of total outstanding debt | |
Customers from BBB class | Up to 3% of total outstanding balance | |
Customers from BB class and below | Up to 3% of total outstanding balance | |
6 | Debt concentration by customer type | |
KHDN | Up to 75% of total outstanding debt | |
Science and technology, household | Minimum 25% of total outstanding debt | |
7 | Concentration of outstanding debt by maturity | |
T-DH outstanding balance | Up to 35% of total outstanding debt | |
Short-term debt | Minimum 65% of total outstanding debt | |
8 | Debt concentration by currency | |
Outstanding balance in VND | Up to 80% of total outstanding debt | |
Outstanding debt in foreign currency | Minimum 20% of total outstanding debt | |
Source: [63]
* Shifting loan structure according to customer and economic sectors
- Loan structure by customer type, economic sector and proportion deviation:
The structure of outstanding loans by customer type and economic sector at Vietinbank has shifted in a positive direction. It can be mentioned that the distinction between customer ownership forms has been eliminated, customer groups have been divided according to scale and lending industry to avoid concentrated risks. In order to match the development trend of the economy, Vietinbank has focused on developing lending products for SMEs in non-state economic sectors. The data in Table 2.6 clearly reflects this situation.
The proportion of outstanding loans to state-owned enterprises tends to decrease gradually. If in 2004, outstanding loans to state-owned enterprises accounted for 45%, in 2005 it was 38% [59], by the end of 2016, outstanding loans to state-owned enterprises (100% state-owned capital) were VND 95,167 billion, accounting for 14.38% of total outstanding loans. Meanwhile, the proportion of outstanding loans to state-owned enterprises (including types of limited liability companies, joint stock companies, and FDI enterprises) increased. In 2008, outstanding loans to state-owned enterprises reached VND 62,305 billion, accounting for 51.6%, then by 2016 it was VND 409,679 billion, accounting for 61.89% of total outstanding loans. In particular, the proportion of outstanding loans to the FDI business sector, if in 2008 it accounted for 2.12% of total outstanding loans, increased to 5.7% by 2016. The data on the deviation of the proportion of outstanding loans to state-owned enterprises between consecutive years shows a mainly decreasing trend except for 2010, 2012, and 2013.
87
Table 2.6. Loan structure by customer type and deviation in proportion of items compared to previous year
Unit: billion VND
Target
Year 2008 | Year 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | |
1. State-owned enterprises | 28,463 | 33,891 | 54,432 | 62.101 | 83,767 | 96,652 | 103,773 | 94,300 | 95,167 |
- Proportion (%) | 23.57 | 20.77 | 23.24 | 21.16 | 25.13 | 25.69 | 23.59 | 17.53 | 14.38 |
- Proportion deviation (%) | - | -2.8 | +2.47 | -2.08 | +3.97 | +0.56 | -2.1 | -6.06 | -3.15 |
2. Non-state enterprises | 62,305 | 92,466 | 132,969 | 175,693 | 197,707 | 218,731 | 259,411 | 327,751 | 409,679 |
- Proportion (%) | 51.6 | 56.67 | 56.77 | 58.87 | 59.31 | 58.13 | 58.67 | 60.91 | 61.89 |
- Proportion deviation (%) | - | +5.07 | +0.1 | +3.1 | -0.56 | -1.18 | +0.84 | +1.84 | +0.98 |
3. Individual | 27,861 | 34,494 | 45,389 | 52,606 | 49,820 | 58,478 | 73,925 | 112,178 | 152,701 |
- Proportion (%) | 23.07 | 21.14 | 19.38 | 17.93 | 14.94 | 15.54 | 16.81 | 20.85 | 23.07 |
- Proportion deviation (%) | - | -1.93 | -1.76 | -1.45 | -2.99 | +0.6 | +1.27 | +4.04 | +2.22 |
4. Other | 2.123 | 2,319 | 1,415 | 3,034 | 2,062 | 2,428 | 2,760 | 3,851 | 4.441 |
- Proportion (%) | 1.76 | 1.42 | 0.6 | 1.08 | 0.62 | 0.65 | 0.68 | 0.71 | 0.66 |
- Proportion deviation (%) | - | -0.34 | -0.82 | +0.43 | -0.41 | +0.03 | -0.02 | +0.08 | -0.05 |
Total outstanding debt | 120,752 | 163,170 | 234,205 | 293,434 | 333,356 | 376,289 | 439,869 | 538,080 | 661,988 |
Source: [59] and NCS's calculation





