For example, the organizational theories of the industry argue that when monopolies in the US grow and develop, they need to increase business efficiency and exploit their advantages, leading to companies having to expand their markets abroad to exploit their advantages in technology, techniques, and management know-how that companies in the same industry in the host country do not have. The explanation for this phenomenon is similar to the explanation for the emergence of new products. Specifically, when a new product is launched, there will be a tendency for monopoly, so to increase efficiency and exploit the effectiveness of new products, businesses expand their markets abroad to increase production scale, exploit monopoly advantages to maximize profits [13].
E'
M'
E
Maybe you are interested!
-
Research on developing direct investment of Vietnamese enterprises in the technology sector in Lao PDR - 25 -
Identify Rating Levels and Rating Scales
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gstourism,quan lan,quang ninh,ecology,ecotourism,minh chau,van don,geography,geographical basis,tourism development,science
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
of the islanders. Therefore, this indicator will be divided into two sub-indicators:
a1. Natural tourism attractiveness a2. Cultural tourism attractiveness
b. Tourist capacity
The two island communes in Quan Lan have different capacities to receive tourists. Minh Chau Commune is home to many standard hotels and resorts, attracting high-income domestic and international tourists. Meanwhile, Quan Lan Commune has many motels mainly built and operated by local people, so the scale and quality are not high, and will be suitable for ordinary tourists such as students.
c. Time of exploitation of Quan Lan Island Commune:
Quan Lan tourism is seasonal due to weather and climate conditions and festivals only take place on certain days of the year, specifically in spring. In Quan Lan commune, the period from April to June and from September to November is considered the best time to visit Quan Lan because the cultural tourism activities are mainly associated with festivals taking place during this time.
Minh Chau island commune:
Tourism exploitation time is all year round, because this is a place with a number of tourist attractions with diverse ecosystems such as Bai Tu Long National Park Research Center, Tram forest, Turtle Laying Beach, so besides coming to the beach for tourism and vacation in the summer, Minh Chau will attract research groups to come for tourism combined with research at other times of the year.
d. Sustainability
The sustainability of ecotourism sites in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes depends on the sensitivity of the ecosystems to climate changes.
landscape. In general, these tourist destinations have a fairly high level of sustainability, because they are natural ecosystems, planned and protected. However, if a large number of tourists gather at certain times, it can exceed the carrying capacity and affect the sustainability of the environment (polluted beaches, damaged trees, animals moving away from their habitats, etc.), then the sustainability of the above ecosystems (natural ecosystems, human ecosystems) will also be affected and become less sustainable.
e. Location and accessibility
Both island communes have ports to take tourists to visit from Van Don wharf:
- Quan Lan – Van Don traffic route:
Phuc Thinh – Viet Anh high-speed boat and Quang Minh high-speed boat, depart at 8am and 2pm from Van Don to Quan Lan, and at 7am and 1pm from Quan Lan to Van Don. There are also wooden boats departing at 7am and 1pm.
- Van Don - Minh Chau traffic route:
Chung Huong high-speed train, Minh Chau train, morning 7:30 and afternoon 13:30 from Van Don to Minh Chau, morning 6:30 and afternoon 13:00 from Minh Chau to Van Don.
f. Infrastructure
Despite receiving investment attention, the issue of infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism on Quan Lan Island is still an issue that needs to be resolved because it has a direct impact on the implementation of ecotourism activities. The minimum conditions for serving tourists such as accommodation, electricity, water, communication, especially medical services, and security work need to be given top priority. Ecotourism spots in Minh Chau commune are assessed to have better infrastructure and technical facilities for tourism because there are quite complete and synchronous conditions for serving tourists, meeting many needs of domestic and foreign tourists.
3.2.1.4. Determine assessment levels and assessment scales
Corresponding to the levels of each criterion, the index is the score of those levels in the order of 4, 3, 2, 1 decreasing according to the standard of each level: very attractive (4), attractive (3), average (2), less attractive (1).
3.2.1.5. Determining the coefficients of the criteria
For the assessment of DLST in the two communes of Quan Lan and Minh Chau islands, the students added evaluation coefficients to show the importance of the criteria and indicators as follows:
Coefficient 3 with criteria: Attractiveness, Exploitation time. These are the 2 most important criteria for attracting tourists to tourism in general and eco-tourism in particular, so they have the highest coefficient.
Coefficient 2 with criteria: Capacity, Infrastructure, Location and accessibility . Because the assessment area is an island commune of Van Don district, the above criteria are selected by the author with appropriate coefficients at the average level.
Coefficient 1 with criteria: Sustainability. Quan Lan has natural and human-made ecotourism sites, with high biodiversity and little impact from local human factors. Most of the ecotourism sites are still wild, so they are highly sustainable.
3.2.1.6. Results of DLST assessment on Quan Lan island
a. Assessment of the potential for natural tourism development
For Minh Chau commune:
+ Natural tourism attractiveness is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined as average (2 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of Capacity criterion is 2 x 2 = 4.
+ Exploitation time is long (4 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Exploitation time criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is assessed as good (3 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 3 x 2 = 6 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Minh Chau commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 4 + 12 + 4 + 4 + 6 = 42 points
Similar assessment for Quan Lan commune, we have the following table:
Table 3.3: Assessment of the potential for natural ecotourism development in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of self-tourismof course
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
CommuneMinh Chau
12
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
42/52
Quan CommuneLan
6
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
33/52
b. Assessment of the potential for humanistic tourism development
For Quan Lan commune:
+ The attractiveness of human tourism is determined to be very attractive (4 points) and the most important coefficient (coefficient 3), so the score of the Attractiveness criterion is 4 x 3 = 12.
+ Capacity is determined to be large (3 points) and the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Capacity criterion is 3 x 2 = 6.
+ Mining time is average (3 points), the most important coefficient (coefficient 3) so the score of the Mining time criterion is 3 x 3 = 9.
+ Sustainability is determined as sustainable (4 points), the important coefficient is the average coefficient (coefficient 1), so the score of the Sustainability criterion is 4 x 1 = 4 points.
+ Location and accessibility are determined to be quite favorable (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), the criterion score is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
+ Infrastructure is rated as average (2 points), the coefficient is quite important (coefficient 2), then the score of the Infrastructure criterion is 2 x 2 = 4 points.
The total score for evaluating DLST in Quan Lan commune according to 6 evaluation criteria is determined as: 12 + 6 + 6 + 4 + 4 + 4 = 36 points.
Similar assessment with Minh Chau commune we have the following table:
Table 3.4: Assessment of the potential for developing humanistic eco-tourism in Quan Lan and Minh Chau communes
Attractiveness of human tourismliterature
Capacity
Mining time
Sustainability
Location and accessibility
Infrastructure
Result
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Point
DarkMulti
Quan CommuneLan
12
12
6
8
9
12
4
4
4
8
4
8
39/52
Minh CommuneChau
6
12
4
8
12
12
4
4
4
8
6
8
36/52
Basically, both Minh Chau and Quan Lan localities have quite favorable conditions for developing ecotourism. However, Quan Lan commune has more advantages to develop ecotourism in a humanistic direction, because this is an area with many famous historical relics such as Quan Lan Communal House, Quan Lan Pagoda, Temple worshiping the hero Tran Khanh Du, ... along with local festivals held annually such as the wind praying ceremony (March 15), Quan Lan festival (June 10-19); due to its location near the port and long exploitation time, the beaches in Quan Lan commune (especially Quan Lan beach) are no longer hygienic and clean to ensure the needs of tourists coming to relax and swim; this is also an area with many beautiful landscapes such as Got Beo wind pass, Ong Phong head, Voi Voi cave, but the ability to access these places is still very limited (dirt hill road, lots of gravel and rocks), especially during rainy and windy times; In addition, other natural resources such as mangrove forests and sea worms have not been really exploited for tourism purposes and ecotourism development. On the contrary, Minh Chau commune has more advantages in developing ecotourism in the direction of natural tourism, this is an area with diverse ecosystems such as at Rua De Beach, Bai Tu Long National Park Conservation Center...; Minh Chau beach is highly appreciated for its natural beauty and cleanliness, ranked in the top ten most beautiful beaches in Vietnam; Minh Chau commune is also home to Tram forest with a large area and a purity of up to 90%, suitable for building bridges through the forest (a very effective type of natural ecotourism currently applied by many countries) for tourists to sightsee, as well as for the purpose of studying and researching.
Figure 3.1: Thenmala Forest Bridge (India) Source: https://www.thenmalaecotourism.com/(August 21, 2019)
3.2.2. Using SWOT matrix to evaluate Quan Lan island tourism
General assessment of current tourism activities of Quan Lan island is shown through the following SWOT matrix:
Table 3.5: SWOT matrix evaluating tourism activities on Quan Lan island
Internal agent
Strengths- There is a lot of potential for tourism development, especially natural ecotourism and humanistic ecotourism.- The unskilled labor force is relatively abundant.- resource environmentunpolluted, still
Weaknesses- Poorly developed infrastructure, especially traffic routes to tourist destinations on the island.- The team of professional staff is still weak.- Tourism products in general
quite wild, originalintact
general and DLST in particularalone is monotonous.
External agents
Opportunity- Tourism is a key industry in the socio-economic development strategy of the province and Van Don economic zone.- Quan Lan was selected as a pilot area for eco-tourism development within the framework of the green growth project between Quang Ninh province and the Japanese organization JICA.- The flow of tourists and especially ecotourism in the world tends toincreasing
Challenge- Weather and climate change abnormally.- Competition in tourism products is increasingly fierce, especially with other localities in the province such as Ha Long, Mong Cai...- Awareness of tourists, especially domestic tourists, about ecotourism and nature conservation is not high.
Through summary analysis using SWOT matrix we see that:
To exploit strengths and take advantage of opportunities, it is necessary to:
- Diversify products and service types (build more tourism routes aimed at specific needs of tourists: experiential tourism immersed in nature, spiritual cultural tourism...)
- Effective exploitation of resources and differentiated products (natural resources and human resources)
div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: #0D0D0D; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -3pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Symbol, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Wingdings; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Cambria, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: #080808; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: #212121; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Overview of Research on Factors Affecting the Linkage of Small and Medium Enterprises with Enterprises with Direct Investment Capital -
Attracting foreign direct investment in the Lao People's Democratic Republic - 1 -
Attracting foreign direct investment in real estate sector in Hanoi - 13
E''
M

AC F
AC D
C
The economic efficiency of production activities depends on the market size, so enterprises often tend to expand both domestic and foreign markets. This is an objective factor for enterprises operating for profit purposes. However, the decision to penetrate foreign markets through OFDI, production for export, or production franchising (license leasing, know-how, technology sales, etc.) also depends on the comparison of the advantages of the enterprise.
P
M'M
O
A' ACQ
Source [13, p. 57]
Graph 1.1: Average production costs in the host country
In the above graph: OQ is the output produced by the company of the investing country and OP is the price of the product of that country. The function C is the average cost per unit of product arising from investment abroad. The function AC D is the average production cost of the investing country company (regardless of whether it is at home or abroad). The function AC F is the total production cost of the company investing in business abroad and is equal to the sum of C + AC D. The MM curve is the import price function after tax. If the output in the host country is less than OA, the company will exploit the monopoly advantage to produce export goods. If the output is greater than OA and less than OC, the company will lease the monopoly advantage. If the output is greater than OC, the company will directly exploit the monopoly advantage abroad and only in this case will FDI appear [13].
Thus, the core cause of FDI is the difference in production costs between countries. This difference is mainly based on the comparative advantages of enterprises in the international division of labor in the phenomenon of capital movement between countries. In this explanation, the specific approach to the factors that determine enterprises to implement OFDI should be more convincing.
In micro theories, prominent theories include:
First: Product life cycle theory
This theory was systematically developed by Raymon Vernon in 1966. With the product cycle approach, Vernon explained the FDI phenomenon based on the analysis of product development stages from innovation to growth, reaching saturation and then decline. According to him, the innovation stage only takes place in developed countries like the US because there are conditions for research and development (R&D) and the ability to deploy production in large volumes. At the same time, only in developed countries can advanced production techniques with the characteristic of using a lot of capital be effectively utilized.
high. Therefore, products that are mass produced at low cost will quickly reach saturation point.
To avoid recession and exploit economies of scale, the company had to expand its consumer market internationally, but its export activities were hindered by tariff barriers and transportation costs. Therefore, the company moved production internationally to overcome these obstacles. Thus, according to Vernon's explanation, FDI is a natural result of the cyclical product development process. His theory is based on the following assumption:
Home producers gain export monopoly advantage by introducing new products or improving existing products for their home market. As products become standardized, during the growth period, producers will increase OFDI to prevent the possibility of losing the market to local producers.
Thanks to the movement of production factors between countries, technological innovation will lead to the emergence of new products that will bring high profits if mass produced. These factors are only available in countries with a lot of capital. The product and its manufacturing method must be commercialized, the manufacturing method standardized. Then, to exploit the comparative advantage, enterprises invest abroad more efficiently than produce domestically for export.
Second: Eclectic Theory (OLI)
According to this theory, companies will implement OFDI when they have 3 advantages:
1. Ownership Advantage (abbreviated as O advantage)
2. Locational Advantage (abbreviated as L advantage)
3. Internalisation Advantages (abbreviated as advantage I)
Advantage O represents : the foreign company needs to have ownership over a series of other companies in its system. This advantage often arises
from investing directly in exploiting a company's intangible assets rather than selling them. A company is often better off using these advantages with at least some of its inputs abroad.
L advantage represents : Regional advantage - is the advantage originating from the investment receiving country related to the cost of transporting products and raw materials, import restrictions, the ability to generate profits for businesses investing abroad. This advantage includes: the country's resources, capital strength, market size and growth, infrastructure development, labor productivity costs, openness in contact with the government, government policies; political stability, profitability and geographical location.
Advantage I represents : It is an advantage related to factors that help investors to conveniently conduct transactions and manage within the company rather than relying on the external market. The advantage of internalization allows companies to: Reduce transaction costs in signing, controlling and implementing contracts; avoid lack of information leading to high costs for companies; avoid the cost of implementing copyrights and patents; gain benefits from economies of scale and diversification; avoid government intervention such as tariff barriers and control input and output markets.
Third, the theory of monopoly advantage
This theory is also known as the market power theory. The essence of this theory is based on the theory of market imperfections. This theory has extended the neoclassical microeconomic model from the free market to explain the deviation of the free market. According to this theory, FDI exists because multinational corporations invest holding oligopolistic advantages on an international scale, including: the reaction of oligopolistic companies, economies of scale and vertical investment linkage. All of these actions are aimed at limiting competition, expanding the market.
oligopolistic firms are able to dominate the market and prevent other competitors from entering their industries and markets [ 6 ]. Because of oligopoly, these firms operate their foreign branches or subsidiaries more efficiently than domestic firms. These advantages stem from the company's superiority in owning intellectual property, which is essentially intangible resources.
This theory focuses on analyzing the advantages of vertical international investment. This form exists when enterprises carry out OFDI to produce intermediate products. These products are then exported back and used as production inputs in the host country.
According to this theory, multinational corporations undertake FDI for the following reasons:
- Multinational companies organize the exploitation of resources in the host country to reduce the cost of raw materials and transportation costs in production. Because the supply of raw materials is increasingly scarce while the companies of the host country do not have the capacity to explore and exploit new raw materials.
- Through vertical international investment, oligopolies establish barriers that prevent other companies from accessing the raw materials they are exploiting.
- Vertical international investment can also create cost advantages through technical improvements by coordinating production and transferring products between different stages of the production process. This is a much greater advantage than the advantage obtained from coordination between independent manufacturers through pricing [ 6 ].
In addition to the main theories above, we can also mention: the industrial location theory explains that businesses move production abroad to be closer to the source of raw materials or consumer markets; V. Lenin's theory of capital export to collect surplus value outside the border is also a theory.
Microeconomic theory to explain the phenomenon of OFDI implementation by enterprises.
1.2.2 Macroeconomic theories
In the theoretical basis system of FDI, macro theories on international investment flows often have an important position and are considered basic theories. Their core content is based on the principle of comparative advantage of investment factors between countries, especially developed and developing countries.
First: International trade theory
a. Heckscher – Ohlin theory of comparative advantage
In his model, Heckscher-Ohlin made the following assumptions:
- The world has only 2 countries, only 2 types of goods (X and Y) and only 2 factors: labor and capital.
- The two countries use the same technology to produce goods and the tastes of the two peoples are the same.
- Goods X contain a lot of labor while goods Y contain a lot of capital.
- The ratio between investment and output of two types of goods in two countries is a constant. Both countries specialize in production to an incomplete degree.
- Perfect competition in the goods market and input factor market in both countries
- Input factors move freely within each country but are hindered internationally.
- There are no transportation costs, no tariff barriers and other obstacles in trade between the two countries.
+ The content of production factors in goods.
Good Y is capital-intensive if the capital/labor ratio used to produce good Y is greater than that of good X in both countries.
A second country is a country with more capital available than the first country if the ratio of capital rental interest to wages in this country is lower than in the first country.
According to the Hecksher-Ohlin theory, starting at the lower right corner of Figure 1.1, we see that preferences and the distribution of factor endowments (i.e., income distribution) determine the demand for goods. The demand for goods determines the derived demand for factors of production. The quantity demanded for factors of production, together with the quantity supplied, determines prices and factors of production under conditions of perfect competition. The prices of factors of production, together with technology, determine the prices of final goods. The differences in the relative final prices of goods between countries determine comparative advantage and the pattern of trade (i.e., which country will produce good X and which country will produce good Y).
Figure 1.1 shows how all these forces work together to determine the prices of final goods. Among these interacting factors, the Hecksher-Ohlin theorem isolates differences in the physical endowments or endowments of factors of production between countries to explain differences in the relative prices of traded goods between countries. In particular, Ohlin explains that preferences and income distributions are similar between countries. This leads to similar demands for final goods and factors of production in different countries. Since the differences in the endowments of factors of production in different countries lead to differences in the relative prices of different goods, trade between countries occurs. Differences in the relative endowments of factors lead to differences in the relative prices of factors and goods, which are shown by the bold lines in Figure 1.1.
The last SP bridge
Consumer tastes or preferences
Income distribution
+ General equilibrium structure of the doctrine
Product price
Domestic equilibrium product price comparison
Price of production factors
Demand for production factors
Trade model
Technology
Supply of production factors
Source: [6, p. 84]
Diagram 1.1: SP price formation process – general equilibrium framework of Hecksher-Ohlin theory
b. Richard S.Eckaus's theory
Based on the Hecksher-Ohlin international trade theory model, Richard S.Eckaus (1987) eliminated the assumption that there is no movement of production factors (capital, technology, etc.) between countries to expand the analysis of the causes of international investment. According to the author, the goal of maximizing profits on a global scale is due to the effective use of investment capital. This is the main cause of the appearance of international investment capital flows. Richard S.Eckaus believes that the investing country often has low capital use efficiency (capital surplus), while the receiving country has higher capital use efficiency (capital shortage). Therefore,





