Home / Technology Innovation

Nguyen Quang Tuan (2007), “Social Capital for Science and Technology Development and Prospects for Vietnam”, Science and Technology Policy Journal No. 14/2007.


State of China , compiled by Phung Minh Lai and Kieu Gia Nhu.

74. Center for Technical Support for Small and Medium Enterprises, Ministry of Planning and Investment (2007), Survey of needs of small and medium enterprises in the Northern provinces , Summary report.

75. CRC Center - Hanoi University of Science and Technology (2005), Investigation and assessment of technology level, proposal of some improvement solutions, and technological innovation for state-owned enterprises and joint stock companies in Quang Binh province , Summary report.

76. Nguyen Quang Tuan (2007), “Social capital for science and technology development and prospects for Vietnam”, Journal of Science and Technology Policy No. 14/2007.

77. Nguyen Quang Tuan (2010), “Promoting commercialization of research and development results in Vietnam”, Communist Magazine No. 5/2010.

78. Nguyen Quang Tuan (2011), Research on theoretical basis and practical implementation of building a program to develop Vietnam's technology market until 2020 , NISTPASS's ministerial-level project report.

79. Dang Vu Tung (2007), Lecture on Technology Management, Hanoi University of Science and Technology.

80. Tran Van Tung (2007), “Technological innovation in some East Asian countries”, Journal of World Economic and Political Issues, No. 5/2007, pp. 3-14.

81. Hoang Van Tuyen (2006), The process of developing innovation policy: International experience and suggestions for Vietnam , NISTPASS project report.

82. Hanoi City People's Committee, " Decision No. 6374/QD-UBND dated December 27, 2010 on Approval of the Program to improve productivity and quality of products and goods of enterprises in Hanoi City 2010 - 2020 ", Project 3.

83. Hanoi City People's Committee, " Decision No. 206/2006/QD-UBND dated November 24, 2006 on promulgating the Regulation on credit guarantee for small and medium enterprises in Hanoi by Hanoi Development Investment Fund ".

84. Central Institute for Economic Management, DOE & GSO (2012), Competitiveness and technology at enterprise level in Vietnam: Survey results in 2010 , Labor Publishing House 2012.


85. Central Institute for Economic Management, UNDP (2006), Report on survey results on technological innovation in Vietnamese industrial enterprises , Synthesis report.

86. Central Institute for Economic Management (2004), Policy mechanisms to promote investment in high-tech innovation and application , Ministry-level project report chaired by Dinh Van An.

87. Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Research (2000), Proceedings of science and technology policy research results, Science and Technology Publishing House.

88. Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Research (2001-2002), Proceedings of Science and Technology Policy Research Results , Science and Technology Publishing House.

89. Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Research (2003-2004), Proceedings of Science and Technology Policy Research Results , Labor Publishing House.

90. Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Research (2005-2006), Proceedings of Science and Technology Policy Research Results , Thanh Nien Publishing House.

91. Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Research (2007-2008), Proceedings of Science and Technology Policy Research Results , Thanh Nien Publishing House.

92. Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Research (2009), Technology import and development policies of some countries in the region , Special information.

93. Institute for Science and Technology Policy and Strategy Research (2009), Research on state financial mechanisms and policies for science and technology activities and innovation activities , Summary report of the topic chaired by Dang Duy Thinh.

94. Ho Duc Viet (2010), Building and developing the science and technology market in a socialist-oriented market economy , National Political Publishing House.

95. Le Thanh Y (2008), “Support for innovative enterprises”, Journal of Science and Technology Policy Research, No. 15/2008.

2. English

96. Asian and Pacific Center for Transfer of Technology & Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment (APCTT & MOSTE, 2001), Technology


Transfer Handbook .

97. Asian Productivity Organization (2007), Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation .

98. Charles Edquist (1997), Systems of Innovation, Pinter, London.

99. Chiesa, V & Manzini, R (1998), “Towards a Framework for Dynamic Technology Strategy”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 10, No. 1, p. 111-129.

100. Christopher Freeman (2008), Systems of Innovation: Selected Essays in Evolutionary Economics , Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

101. C.Wang, Lu and Chen (2008), “Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty”, Technovation, 28(6), 349-363, SCI Journal.

102. Department of Industrial Technology, Ministry of Economic Affairs, ROC (2008), Taiwan's Industrial Technology Innovation.

103. ESCAP (1989), Technology Atlas Project – A framework for technology based development .

104. Eriksson (2005), Innovation Policies in South Korea , VINNOVA.

105. Frederick Betz (1998), Strategic Technology Management , Mc Graw-Hill.

106. Hans J Thamhain (2005), Management of technology: Managing effectively in technology intensive organizations , John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

107. Intarakumnerd P, Chairatana PA, Tangchitpiboon T (2002), National innovation system in less successful developing countries: the case of Thailand,, National Science & Technology Development Agency, Bangkok, Thailand.

108. Jomo KS (2001), Technology Policy in Malaysia .

www.jomoks.org/research/pdf/Felker_Jomo_Tech_Policy_book.pdf.

109. Jop. Holdren (2010), ''Science and Technology Policy and Innovation in the Obama Administration"; nistpass.gov.vn, July 2011.

110. K.Ranmanathan (2009), Managing international technology transfer in Today's Global Business Setting , Organized by MOST & UN-ESCAP/APCTT.

111. Laure Morel Guimaraes, Tarek M Khalil, Yasser A Hosni (2005),


Management of technology: Key success factors for innovation and sustainability , Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

112. Melissa A Schilling (2009), Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , Mc Graw-Hill.

113. M.Lovey and Charles (1998), Environmental Management and Institutions in OECD , WB Publications ( http://wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/ IB/2000/01/25/000094946_00011205340794/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf).

114. OECD (1996), Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data, Oslo manual.

115 . OECD (2005), Guideline for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3 rd

edition , Oslo manual.

116. OECD (2007), Innovation and Growth: Rational for an Innovation Strategy , Paris.

117. OECD (2011), Review of Innovation in Southeast Asia, Country Profile of Innovation: Thailand and Malaysia

118. OECD (2002, 2006), OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook .

119. Sunil Mani (2002), Government, Innovation and Technology Policy: An International Comparative Analysis, New Horizons in the Economics of Innovations , Edward Elgar.

120. Serifah Habibah Abd. Majid (2007), Towards Innovation Policy in Malaysia

121. Tarek M Khalil (2002), Management of technology , Mc Graw-Hill.

122. Twiss, B (1992), Managing technological innovation , Pitman, London.

123. VKNarayanan, New Jersey (2001), Managing technology and innovation for competitive advantage , Prentice hall.

124. Young Roak Kim (2001), Technology Commercialization in Republic of Korea, Korea Technology Transfer Center (KTTC).

125. World Bank (2010), Inovation Policy: A guide for Developing Countries , Washington, DC

126. World Bank (2010), Handbook on impact Evaluation: Quantitative methods


and Practices , Shahidur R.Khandker, Gayatri B.Koolwal, Hussain A.Samad, Wasington, DC

127. World Bank (2004), Logical Framework Approach to Project Cycle Management, Public Disclosure Authorized, Washington, DC 20433.

128. World Bank (2010), Thailand Economic Monitor , Washington DC

129. World Bank (2010), Malaysia Economic Monitor: Growth through Innovation , Washington, DC

130. Zhang Wei, Steven White and Jian Gao (2005), China's venture capital in innovation network, Tsinghua University.

3. Websites:


www.chinhphu.vn;

www.na.gov.vn;

www.mof.gov.vn;

www.nistpass.gov.vn;

www.most.gov.vn;

www.noip.gov.vn;

www.mti.vn;

www.gdt.gov.vn;

www.mpi.gov.vn;

www.ciem.gov.vn;

www.moit.gov.vn;

www.vpc.vn;

www.nafosted.vn;

www.hanoi.gov.vn;

www.unido.org;

www.worldbank.org.vn

www.truyenthongkhoahoc.vn;

www.nacentech.vn;

www.weforum.org;

www.vistec.gov.vn; www.imf.org;

www.cpv.org.vn;

and other websites.

Maybe you are interested!

Nguyen Quang Tuan (2007), “Social Capital for Science and Technology Development and Prospects for Vietnam”, Science and Technology Policy Journal No. 14/2007.


APPENDIX

APPENDIX 1: SAMPLE INVESTIGATION FORM ON INDUSTRIAL EDUCATION ACTIVITIES OF ENTERPRISES IN HANOI

Dear Sir/Madam, I am a lecturer at the National Economics University, currently conducting a research on state policy to promote technological innovation (IT) by enterprises. There will be no right or wrong questions, your answers will only be used for scientific research, and your personal information will be kept strictly confidential. Thank you very much!

Our questionnaire consists of 3 parts with the following structure:

Part 1: General information about the business

Part 2: Current status of technological innovation of enterprises

Part 3: Business assessment of CSNN to promote innovative enterprises

Part 1: General information about the business

Please fill in the information, actual figures and mark (x) in the appropriate boxes:

1.1. Business name:

1.2. Address/phone:

1.3. Year of establishment/website:

1.4. Total capital (billion VND):

1 Under 1 billion; 2 From 1 to 20 billion; 3 From 20 to 100 billion; 4 Other ( specify ):….......................

1.5. Total number of employees of the enterprise (people):

1 Under 10 people; 2 From 10 to 200 people; 3 From 200 to 300 people; 4 Other ( specify ):……......

1.6. Type of ownership:

1 State; 2 Private; 3 Foreign invested; 4 Other ( specify ):….............................

1.7. Main areas of activity in the industry:

1Chemicals;2Textile;3Electricity - electronics;4Mechanical;5Food processing;6Leather shoes;

7 Software technology; 8 Other ( specify ):…................................................................................

1.8. Enterprises achieving revenue targets in the last 3 years:

1Strongly disagree;2Disagree;3Average;4Agree;3Totally agree

1.9. The technology that the business is using has its origin:

1Domestic research and development;2Imported from abroad;3Joint venture

1.10. In general, how much % of revenue does a business invest in innovation each year?

1 Less than 0.5%; 2 from 0.5 to 1%; 3 from 1 to 2%; 4 Other ( specify ):……..%

1.11. In general, compared to the corporate world using advanced technology:

1Very low;2Low;3Average;4High;5Very high

1.12. Full name of the person providing information ( not required ):

1.13. Position of the information provider ( not required ):


Part 2: Current status of technological innovation of enterprises

The following contents are related to the current state of technological innovation in enterprises. Please express your opinion by marking (x) in the appropriate box:


2.1. Enterprises' awareness of the necessity of conducting innovation activities:

Activities

Very

unnecessary

Unnecessary

Medium


Necessary

Very necessary

2.1.1. Improvement/new investment in production line

current technology

1

2

3

4

5

2.1.2. Product research & development

new/new process

1

2

3

4

5

2.1.3. Improving human resource capacity

technology for the DMCN

1

2

3

4

5

2.1.4. Organizational structure for the DMCN

1

2

3

4

5

2.1.5. In general, the level of awareness of

Enterprises for industrial activities

1

2

3

4

5


2.2. Current business needs for innovation activities

Activities

Very not

demand

No need

Normal

In need

Very much in demand

2.2.1. Improvement/new investment in production line

current technology

1

2

3

4

5

2.2.2. Product research & development

new/new process

1

2

3

4

5

2.2.3. Improving human resource capacity

technology for the DMCN

1

2

3

4

5

2.2.4. Organization of production apparatus structure

export/operate

1

2

3

4

5

2.2.5. In general, businesses have a need

DMCN Bridge

1

2

3

4

5


2.3. Origin of ideas for business innovation activities

Categories

Have

Hollow

Are not

2.3.1. Arising during the production process

1

2

3

2.3.2. By customer/supplier suggestion

1

2

3

2.3.3. By sending staff to study, train/learn the

other businesses

1

2

3

2.3.4. Arising from trade fairs/conferences, etc.

1

2

3



2.3.5. Arising from information sources on the work

technology from technology centers

1

2

3


2.4. Main reasons leading to technological innovation in businesses

The main reasons

Are not

significant

Less meaningful

Significant

Very meaningful

Decisive

determine

2.4.1. Innovative enterprises aim to improve quality

product quantity/cost reduction/productivity improvement

1

2

3

4

5

2.4.2. The business of the DMCN aims to meet the requirements

regulations on standards for products and environment

1

2

3

4

5

2.4.3. Enterprises innovate technology due to pressure

competition in the market

1

2

3

4

5

2.4.4. Enterprises innovate technology because they will receive

receive incentives from the State

1

2

3

4

5


2.5. Current status of technology level and investment in technological innovation of enterprises

Categories

Very not

Agree

Are not

Agree

Normal

Agree

Very

Agree

2.5.1. Enterprises are using mainly secondary technology.

depend on raw materials imported from abroad

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.2. Businesses are using technology that has

high level of synchronization

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.3. In general, businesses are using

Advanced technology for production and business

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.4. In the past 3 years, the business

Regularly improve/invest in production lines

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.5. In the past 3 years, the company has regularly

research & develop new products/new processes

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.6. In the past 3 years, the company has regularly

improve human resource capacity in technology

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.7. In the past 3 years, the company has regularly

organizational structure serving the DMCN

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.8. Enterprises regularly update information.

Information related to technology and copyright

1

2

3

4

5

2.5.9. In general, businesses often

investment in innovation activities

1

2

3

4

5

Comment


Agree Privacy Policy *