Daniela, F., Gena, C.S., Ross, H.N., & Ute, H. (2019). How strongly does Statistic reasoning influence knowledge and acceptance of evolution. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/
Dao Hong Nam. (2014). Teaching Probability - Statistics at Medical University . PhD Thesis in Educational Sciences, Ho Chi Minh City University of Education.
Darlington, E. (2013). The use of Bloom's taxonomy in advanced mathematics questions . In Smith, C. (Ed). Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 33(1), pp. 7-12.
Davis, MH, & Harden, RM (1998), AMEE Education Guide No.15. Problem-based learning: a practical guide. Medical Teacher 21(2), pp. 130-140.
Maybe you are interested!
-
Assessing medical statistical reasoning ability of students when solving practical problems - 2 -
Statistical research on assessing sustainable development in Vietnam - 16 -
Mobile Phone Usage in Hanoi Inner City Area
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gsconsumer,consumption,consumer behavior,marketing,mobile marketing
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- Test the relationship between demographic variables and consumer behavior for Mobile Marketing activities
The analysis method used is the Chi-square test (χ2), with statistical hypotheses H0 and H1 and significance level α = 0.05. In case the P index (p-value) or Sig. index in SPSS has a value less than or equal to the significance level α, the hypothesis H0 is rejected and vice versa. With this testing procedure, the study can evaluate the difference in behavioral trends between demographic groups.
CHAPTER 4
RESEARCH RESULTS
During two months, 1,100 survey questionnaires were distributed to mobile phone users in the inner city of Hanoi using various methods such as direct interviews, sending via email or using questionnaires designed on the Internet. At the end of the survey, after checking and eliminating erroneous questionnaires, the study collected 858 complete questionnaires, equivalent to a rate of about 78%. In addition, the research subjects of the thesis are only people who are using mobile phones, so people who do not use mobile phones are not within the scope of the thesis, therefore, the questionnaires with the option of not using mobile phones were excluded from the scope of analysis. The number of suitable survey questionnaires included in the statistical analysis was 835.
4.1 Demographic characteristics of the sample
The structure of the survey sample is divided and statistically analyzed according to criteria such as gender, age, occupation, education level and personal income. (Detailed statistical table in Appendix 6)
- Gender structure: Of the 835 completed questionnaires, 49.8% of respondents were male, equivalent to 416 people, and 50.2% were female, equivalent to 419 people. The survey results of the study are completely consistent with the gender ratio in the population structure of Vietnam in general and Hanoi in particular (Male/Female: 49/51).
- Age structure: 36.6% of respondents are <23 years old, equivalent to 306 people. People from 23-34 years old
accounting for the highest proportion: 44.8% equivalent to 374 people, people aged 35-45 and >45 are 70 and 85 people equivalent to 8.4% and 10.2% respectively. Looking at the results of this survey, we can see that the young people - youth account for a large proportion of the total number of people participating in the survey. Meanwhile, the middle-aged people including two age groups of 35 - 45 and >45 have a low rate of participation in the survey. This is completely consistent with the reality when Mobile Marketing is identified as a Marketing service aimed at young people (people under 35 years old).
- Structure by educational level: among 835 valid responses, 541 respondents had university degrees, accounting for the highest proportion of ~ 75%, 102 had secondary school degrees, ~ 13.1%, and 93 had post-graduate degrees, ~ 11.9%.
- Occupational structure: office workers and civil servants are the group with the highest rate of participation with 39.4%, followed by students with 36.6%. Self-employed people account for 12%, retired housewives are 7.8% and other occupational groups account for 4.2%. The survey results show that the student group has the same rate as the group aged <23 at 36.6%. This shows the accuracy of the survey data. In addition, the survey results distributed by occupational criteria have a rate almost similar to the sample division rate in chapter 3. Therefore, it can be concluded that the survey data is suitable for use in analysis activities.
- Income structure: the group with income from 3 to 5 million has the highest rate with 39% of the total number of respondents. This is consistent with the income structure of Hanoi people and corresponds to the average income of the group of civil servants and office workers. Those
People with no income account for 23%, income under 3 million VND accounts for 13% and income over 5 million VND accounts for 25%.
4.2 Mobile phone usage in Hanoi inner city area
According to the survey results, most respondents said they had used the phone for more than 1 year, specifically: 68.4% used mobile phones from 4 to 10 years, 23.2% used from 1 to 3 years, 7.8% used for more than 10 years. Those who used mobile phones for less than 1 year accounted for only a very small proportion of ~ 0.6%. (Table 4.1)
Table 4.1: Time spent using mobile phones
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Alid
<1 year
5
.6
.6
.6
1-3 years
194
23.2
23.2
23.8
4-10 years
571
68.4
68.4
92.2
>10 years
65
7.8
7.8
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The survey indexes on the time of using mobile phones of consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very impressive for a developing country like Vietnam and also prove that Vietnamese consumers have a lot of experience using this high-tech device. Moreover, with the majority of consumers surveyed having a relatively long time of use (4-10 years), it partly proves that mobile phones have become an important and essential item in people's daily lives.
When asked about the mobile phone network they are using, 31% of respondents said they are using the network of Vietel company, 29% use the network of
of Mobifone company, 27% use Vinaphone company's network and 13% use networks of other providers such as E-VN telecom, S-fone, Beeline, Vietnammobile. (Figure 4.1).
Figure 4.1: Mobile phone network in use
Compared with the announced market share of mobile telecommunications service providers in Vietnam (Vietel: 36%, Mobifone: 29%, Vinaphone: 28%, the remaining networks: 7%), we see that the survey results do not have many differences. However, the statistics show that there is a difference in the market share of other networks because the Hanoi market is one of the two main markets of small networks, so their market share in this area will certainly be higher than that of the whole country.
According to a report by NielsenMobile (2009) [8], the number of prepaid mobile phone subscribers in Hanoi accounts for 95% of the total number of subscribers, however, the results of this survey show that the percentage of prepaid subscribers has decreased by more than 20%, only at 70.8%. On the contrary, the number of postpaid subscribers tends to increase from 5% in 2009 to 19.2%. Those who are simultaneously using both types of subscriptions account for 10%. (Table 4.2).
Table 4.2: Types of mobile phone subscribers
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
Prepay
591
70.8
70.8
70.8
Pay later
160
19.2
19.2
89.9
Both of the above
84
10.1
10.1
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The above figures show the change in the psychology and consumption habits of Vietnamese consumers towards mobile telecommunications services, when the use of prepaid subscriptions and junk SIMs is replaced by the use of two types of subscriptions for different purposes and needs or switching to postpaid subscriptions to enjoy better customer care services.
In addition, the majority of respondents have an average spending level for mobile phone services from 100 to 300 thousand VND (406 ~ 48.6% of total respondents). The high spending level (> 500 thousand VND) is the spending level with the lowest number of people with only 8.4%, on the contrary, the low spending level (under 100 thousand VND) accounts for the second highest proportion among the groups of respondents with 25.4%. People with low spending levels mainly fall into the group of students and retirees/housewives - those who have little need to use or mainly use promotional SIM cards. (Table 4.3).
Table 4.3: Spending on mobile phone charges
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
<100,000
212
25.4
25.4
25.4
100-300,000
406
48.6
48.6
74.0
300,000-500,000
147
17.6
17.6
91.6
>500,000
70
8.4
8.4
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The statistics in Table 4.3 are similar to the percentages in the NielsenMobile survey results (2009) with 73% of mobile phone users having medium spending levels and only 13% having high spending levels.
The survey results also showed that up to 31% ~ nearly one-third of respondents said they sent more than 10 SMS messages/day, meaning that on average they sent 1 SMS message for every working hour. Those with an average SMS message volume (from 3 to 10 messages/day) accounted for 51.1% and those with a low SMS message volume (less than 3 messages/day) accounted for 17%. (Table 4.4)
Table 4.4: Number of SMS messages sent per day
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
<3 news
142
17.0
17.0
17.0
3-10 news
427
51.1
51.1
68.1
>10 news
266
31.9
31.9
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
Similar to sending messages, those with an average message receiving rate (from 3-10 messages/day) accounted for the highest percentage of ~ 55%, followed by those with a high number of messages (over 10 messages/day) ~ 24% and those with a low number of messages received daily (under 3 messages/day) remained at the bottom with 21%. (Table 4.5)
Table 4.5: Number of SMS messages received per day
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
<3 news
175
21.0
21.0
21.0
3-10 news
436
55.0
55.0
76.0
>10 news
197
24.0
24.0
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
When comparing the data of the two result tables 4.4 and 4.5, we can see the reasonableness between the ratio of the number of messages sent and the number of messages received daily by the interview participants.
4.3 Current status of SMS advertising and Mobile Marketing
According to the interview results, in the 3 months from the time of the survey and before, 94% of respondents, equivalent to 785 people, said they received advertising messages, while only a very small percentage of 6% (only 50 people) did not receive advertising messages (Table 4.6).
Table 4.6: Percentage of people receiving advertising messages in the last 3 months
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
Have
785
94.0
94.0
94.0
Are not
50
6.0
6.0
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The results of Table 4.6 show that consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very familiar with advertising messages. This result is also the basis for assessing the knowledge, experience and understanding of the respondents in the interview. This is also one of the important factors determining the accuracy of the survey results.
In addition, most respondents said they had received promotional messages, but only 24% of them had ever taken the action of registering to receive promotional messages, while 76% of the remaining respondents did not register to receive promotional messages but still received promotional messages every day. This is the first sign indicating the weaknesses and shortcomings of lax management of this activity in Vietnam. (Table 4.7)
div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 5.5pt; vertical-align: 3pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:"Courier New", monospace; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s25 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s26 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s27 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 1.5pt; } div.maincontent .s28 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s29 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s30 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s31 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s32 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s33 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s35 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s36 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s37 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s38 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s39 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s40 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 4pt; } div.maincontent .s41 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s42 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s43 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s44 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s45 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s46 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s47 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s48 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s49 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s50 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s51 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s52 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s53 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s54 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s55 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s56 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s57 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s58 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s59 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s60 { color: #00F; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s61 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s62 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s63 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .content_head2 { color: #F00; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s64 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s67 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s68 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s69 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s70 { color: black; font-family:"Times New Roman", serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex -
Assessing customer satisfaction with the quality of medical examination and treatment at Ba Ria General Hospital - 11 -
Statistical Table of Test Results of Classes 10A1 and 10A6
delMas, R.C. (2002). Statistical literacy, reasoning and learning: A commentary [Electronic Version], Journal of Statistics Education , 10, 11. Retrieved July 20, 2006, from http://www.amstat.org/publication/jse.
delMas, R.C., Garfield, J., & Chance, B.L. (1999, April). Expore the role of computer simulations developing understanding of sampling distributions . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.

delMas, R.C., Garfield, J., & Chance, B.L. (2004, April). Using assessment to study the development of students' reasoning about sampling distributions . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
Doan Duc Hoang. (2017). The role of SvO 2 index in predicting fluid resuscitation in high-risk cardiac surgery patients . Doctoral thesis in Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University.
Duch, B.J., Groh, SE, & Allen, DE (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education . In: The Power of Problem-Based Learning (eds BJ Duch, SE Groh & DE Allen), pp. 3-
13. Stylus Publishers, Virginia Beach, VA.
Ebel, R.L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement. Prentice Hall, pp. 348-349.
Edwards, D., & Hamson, M.J. (2001). Guide to Mathematical Modeling, Second Edition. London: Palgrave Mathematical Guides.
Epstein, RJ (2004), Learning from the problems of problem-based learning. BMC Medical Education. 4, 1. Available at:
http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6920/4/1. Accessed on July 27, 2009.
Ernest, P. (1994). Social constructivism and the psychology of mathematics education. Constructing Mathematical Knowledge: Epistemology and Mathematics Education. Falmer Press, London, pp. 62-72.
Freeman, R., & Lewis, R. (1998). Planning and implementing assessment . London: Kogan Page.
Gal, I. (2002), Adults' statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities, International Statistical Review , 70(1), pp. 1-51.
Gal, I., & Garfield, J.B. (1997). The assessment challenge in statistical education.
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
Garfield, J. (1993). An authentic assessment of students' statistical knowledge. In The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 1993 Yearbook: Assessment in the Mathematics Classroom . N. Webb (Ed.), pp. 187-196. Reston, VA:NCTM.
Garfield, J. (1998a). Challenges in Assessing Statistical Reasoning . Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Diego, CA.
Garfield, J. (1998b). The Statistical Reasoning Assessment: Development and Validation of a Research Tool in Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Teaching Statistics , ed. L. Pereira-Mendoza, Voorburg, The Netherlands: International Statistical Institute, pp. 781-786.
Garfield, J. (2002). The challenge of developing Statistical reasoning. Journal of Statistics Education , Vol. 10, No. 3. http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v10n3/garfield.html
Garfield, J., delMas, R., & Chance, B. (2003). Web-based assessment resource tools for improving Statistical thinking. Paper presented at The annual meeting of the American Educational research association, Chicago.
Garfield, J., & Gal, I. (1999). Teaching and Assessing Statistical Reasoning, in Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12, ed. L. Stiff, Reston, VA: National Council Teachers of Mathematics, 207–219.
Gierl, M.J. (1997). Coparing cognitive representations of test developers and students on a mathematics test with Bloom's Taxonomy. The Journal of Educational Research , 91 (1), pp. 26-32.
Guskey, T. R. (1997). Implementing mastery learning, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. Guskey, T. R. (2003). How classroom assessments can improve learning ,
Educational Leadership, Vol. 60, No. 5.
Jones, GA, Langrall, CW, & Mooney, ES (2007). Research in probability: Responding to classroom realities. In The Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics , Ed. FK Lester, pp. 909-956. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Jones, GA, Langrall, CW, Thornton, CA, Mooney, E.S., Wares, E., Jones, R.M., ... Nisbet, S. (2001). Using student's static thinking to inform instruction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior , 20, pp. 109-144.
Hawking, A., Jolliffe, F., & Glickman, L. (1992). Teaching Statistical concepts . The Effective Teachers Series. New York: Longman.
Hoang Nam Hai. (2013). Developing statistical reasoning capacity for professional college students . Doctoral thesis in Educational Sciences, Vinh University.
Hoang Trong Hanh. (2015). Study on serum S100B and NSE protein concentrations in patients with acute cerebral infarction at Hue Central Hospital . Doctoral thesis in Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University.
Kilpatrick, J. (1993). The chain and the arrow: From the history of mathematics assessment. In Investigations into mathematics education: An ICMI study, ed.
M. Niss, pp. 31-46. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cogn. Instruction. , 6(1), pp. 59-98.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J.A. (1980). Problem solving: A handbook for teachers (2nd ed .). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lewy, A. (1990). Formative and Summative Evaluation , Publisher at Pergamon Press.
Le Thi Hoai Chau., Le Van Tien., Bessot, A., & Comiti, C. (2009). Basic elements of Didactic Mathematics . Ho Chi Minh City National University Publishing House.
Le Thi Hoai Chau., & Comiti, C. (2018). Anthropological Theory in Didactic Mathematics .
Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Publishing House.
Luu Ngoc Hoat. (2017). Medical science research (volume 1) . Medical Publishing House.
Mathews, D., & Clark, J. (2003). Successful Students' Concepts of Mean, Standard Deviation and the Central Limit Theore. Unpublished papers. Retrieved October 20, 2007.
from http://www1.hollins.edu/faculty/clarkjm/stats1.pdf.
Moon, J., & Schulman, L.(1995). Linking Assessment, Instruction and Curriculum in Elementary Mathematics . Heinemann Publisher.
Mooney, E.S. (2002). A framework for characterizing middle school students' statistical thinking. Mathematical Thingking and Learning , 4, pp. 23-63.
Moore, D.S. (1998). Statistics among the liberal arts. Journal of the American Statistical Association , 93(444), pp. 1253-1259.
Moore, D.S. (2004). Foreword. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds), The Challenge of Developing Statiscal Literacy, Reasoning an Thinking , Boston, MA: Kluer Academic publishers.
Moyé, LA (2006). Statistical Reasoning in Medicine , Springer, New York.
Nancy, CL, & Susanne, PL (2006). Statistical reasoning of middle school children engaged in survey inquiry , Montreal, Que., Canada.
Neil, L. (2006). Teaching Quantitative Reasoning , New York.
Newman, M. (2003). A Pilot Systematic Review and Meta Analysis on the Effectiveness of Problem-Based Learning – Special Report 2 . Learning and Teaching Support Network Subject Center for Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine, Newcastle (ISBN: 0701701587).
Nguyen Ba Kim. (2015). Mathematics teaching methods . National University of Education Publishing House, Hanoi.
Nguyen Ngoc Rang. (2012). Research design and Medical Statistics . Medical Publishing House.
Nguyen Thanh Tung. (2016). Teaching Probability and Statistics towards enhancing application in medical practice for medical students . Doctoral thesis in Educational Sciences, Hanoi National University of Education.
Nguyen Thi Lan Phuong. (2007). Assessment and evaluation in mathematics teaching. Lecture for graduate students, Institute of Strategy and Educational Program, Hanoi.
Nguyen Thi Lan Phuong. (2016). Assessment and evaluation in mathematics teaching. Lecture for graduate students, Institute of Strategy and Educational Program, Hanoi.
Nisbett, R. (1993). Rules for Reasoning , Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
OECD (2002). Definition and Section of Competencies (DeSeCo): Theoretical and Conceptual Foundation . OECD, Paris, France.
OECD (2003a). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework – Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills , Paris.
OECD (2003b). Learning for Tomorrow's World . OECD, Paris, France.
OECD (2009a). The PISA 2009 Assessment Framework–Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. OECD, Paris, France.
OECD (2009b). Learning Mathematics for Life – a perspective view from PISA. OECD, Paris, France.
Perkins, DV, & Saris, RN (2001). A “jigsaw classroom” for technical undergraduate statistics courses. Teaching Psychol., 28, pp. 111-113.
Pfannkuch, M. (2005). Probability and statistical inference: How can teachers enable learners to make the connection? In Exploring Probability in School: Challenges for Teaching and Learning , Ed. GA Jones, pp. 267-294. New York: Springer.
Potthast, M.J. (1999). Outcomes of using small-group cooperative learning experiences in introductory statistics courses. College Student J. , 33, pp. 34- 42.
Pountney, D., Leinbach, C., & Etchells, T. (2002). The issue of appropriate assessment in the presence of CAS. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology , 33(1): pp. 1-14.
Riffenburgh, R.H. (2012). Statistics in Medicine . New York: Academic Press. Rosidah, IKB, & Dwi, J. (2018). An Analysis of Statistical Reasoning Process of
High School Students in Solving the Statistical Problem. https://iopscience.iop.org.
Rumsey, B.J. (2002). Statistical Literacy as a Goal for Introductory Statistics. Journal of Statistics Education [Online], 10(3). Retrieved June 24, 2003, from http://www.amstat.org/publication/jse.
Savin-Baden, M. (2000). Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Untold Stories. Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press , Bukingham.
Schmidt, H. G. (1983). Problem based learning: rationale and description . Medical Education, 17, pp. 11-16.
Sedlmeier, P. (1999). Improving Statistical Reasoning: Theoretical Models and Practical Implications, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions . In Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. DA Grouws (Ed.), pp. 465-494. New York: Macmillan.
Shaughnessy, J.M. (1997). Missed opportunities in research on the teaching and learning of data and opportunities. In People in Mathematics Education (Proceedings of the 20th annual meetings of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia), Eds. F. Biddulph and K. Carr, pp. 6–22. Rotorua, New Zealand: MERGA.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (2007). Research on statistics learning and reasoning. In The Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics , Ed. FK Lester, pp. 957- 1010. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM).
Smith, G., Wood, L., Coupland, M., Stephenson, B., Crawford, K. & Ball, G. (1996). Constructing mathematical examinations to assess a range of knowledge and skills . International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology 27(1), pp. 65-77.
Snee, R. (1999). Discussion: Development and use of statistical thinking: A new era , International Statistical Review, 67(3), pp. 255-258.
Sternberg, R.J. (1994). Allowing for thinking styles . Educational Leadership, 52(3), pp. 36-40.
Stiggins, R.J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning , Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), pp. 758-765.
Susan, MC, & David, BS (2001). Constructing Written Test Questions For the Basic and Clinical Sciences (Third edition). National Broad of Medical Examiners, Printed in the United States of America.
Swearinge, R. (2002). Diagnostic, Formative & Summative Assessment, http://www. ewcupdate.com/userfiles/assessmentnetwork.
Tall, D.O. (1991). Advanced Mathematical Thinking, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dorgrecht, Boston, London.
Tan, K. (2011). Assessment for learning in Singapore: unpacking its meanings and identifying some areas for improvement. Educational Research for Policy and Practice , 10(2), pp. 91-103.
Thomson, D.R., & Senk, S.L. (2008). A multi-dimentional approach to understanding in mathematics textbooks developed by UCSMP . Paper presented in Discussion Group 17 of the International Congress on Mathematics Education. Monterrey, Mexico.
Tran Thi Dieu Trang., & Tran Thuy Hien. (2015). Probability - Medical Statistics , Hue University Publishing House.
Tran Vui. (2014). Solving practical problems in teaching mathematics. Hue University Publishing House.
Tran Vui. (2017). From learning theories to practice in mathematics education . Hue University Publishing House.
Tran Vui. (2018). Assessment of math proficiency: Deep understanding of concepts and mastery of basic skills in problem solving . Hanoi National University of Education Publishing House.
Valleron, A.J., Beuscart, R., Bénichou, J., Roy, P., & Quantin, C. (2009).
Biostatistics , Omniscience, Paris.
Vo Minh Phuong. (2018). Study on plasma Leptin and Adiponectin concentrations in overweight and obese people. Doctoral thesis in Medicine.
Vu Thi Ngan. (2015). Developing statistical reasoning ability for 10th grade students in high school . Master's thesis in Educational Science.
Watson, J. M. (1997). Assessing statistical literacy through the use of media surveys. Print
I. Gal & J. Garfield, The assessment challenge in statistics education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: International statistical institute/IOS Press.
Watson, J.M. (2003), Statistical literacy at the school level: What should students know and do? Paper presented at the International Statistical Institute 54 the Session, Berlin, Germany.
Wild, C.J., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical Thinking in Empirical Inquiry. International Statistical Review , 67 (3), pp. 223-265.
Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (2004). Towards an understanding of statistical thinking. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds), Challenge of Developing Statiscal Literacy, Reasoning and Thinking , Boston, MA: Kluer Academic publishers.



![Mobile Phone Usage in Hanoi Inner City Area
zt2i3t4l5ee
zt2a3gsconsumer,consumption,consumer behavior,marketing,mobile marketing
zt2a3ge
zc2o3n4t5e6n7ts
- Test the relationship between demographic variables and consumer behavior for Mobile Marketing activities
The analysis method used is the Chi-square test (χ2), with statistical hypotheses H0 and H1 and significance level α = 0.05. In case the P index (p-value) or Sig. index in SPSS has a value less than or equal to the significance level α, the hypothesis H0 is rejected and vice versa. With this testing procedure, the study can evaluate the difference in behavioral trends between demographic groups.
CHAPTER 4
RESEARCH RESULTS
During two months, 1,100 survey questionnaires were distributed to mobile phone users in the inner city of Hanoi using various methods such as direct interviews, sending via email or using questionnaires designed on the Internet. At the end of the survey, after checking and eliminating erroneous questionnaires, the study collected 858 complete questionnaires, equivalent to a rate of about 78%. In addition, the research subjects of the thesis are only people who are using mobile phones, so people who do not use mobile phones are not within the scope of the thesis, therefore, the questionnaires with the option of not using mobile phones were excluded from the scope of analysis. The number of suitable survey questionnaires included in the statistical analysis was 835.
4.1 Demographic characteristics of the sample
The structure of the survey sample is divided and statistically analyzed according to criteria such as gender, age, occupation, education level and personal income. (Detailed statistical table in Appendix 6)
- Gender structure: Of the 835 completed questionnaires, 49.8% of respondents were male, equivalent to 416 people, and 50.2% were female, equivalent to 419 people. The survey results of the study are completely consistent with the gender ratio in the population structure of Vietnam in general and Hanoi in particular (Male/Female: 49/51).
- Age structure: 36.6% of respondents are <23 years old, equivalent to 306 people. People from 23-34 years old
accounting for the highest proportion: 44.8% equivalent to 374 people, people aged 35-45 and >45 are 70 and 85 people equivalent to 8.4% and 10.2% respectively. Looking at the results of this survey, we can see that the young people - youth account for a large proportion of the total number of people participating in the survey. Meanwhile, the middle-aged people including two age groups of 35 - 45 and >45 have a low rate of participation in the survey. This is completely consistent with the reality when Mobile Marketing is identified as a Marketing service aimed at young people (people under 35 years old).
- Structure by educational level: among 835 valid responses, 541 respondents had university degrees, accounting for the highest proportion of ~ 75%, 102 had secondary school degrees, ~ 13.1%, and 93 had post-graduate degrees, ~ 11.9%.
- Occupational structure: office workers and civil servants are the group with the highest rate of participation with 39.4%, followed by students with 36.6%. Self-employed people account for 12%, retired housewives are 7.8% and other occupational groups account for 4.2%. The survey results show that the student group has the same rate as the group aged <23 at 36.6%. This shows the accuracy of the survey data. In addition, the survey results distributed by occupational criteria have a rate almost similar to the sample division rate in chapter 3. Therefore, it can be concluded that the survey data is suitable for use in analysis activities.
- Income structure: the group with income from 3 to 5 million has the highest rate with 39% of the total number of respondents. This is consistent with the income structure of Hanoi people and corresponds to the average income of the group of civil servants and office workers. Those
People with no income account for 23%, income under 3 million VND accounts for 13% and income over 5 million VND accounts for 25%.
4.2 Mobile phone usage in Hanoi inner city area
According to the survey results, most respondents said they had used the phone for more than 1 year, specifically: 68.4% used mobile phones from 4 to 10 years, 23.2% used from 1 to 3 years, 7.8% used for more than 10 years. Those who used mobile phones for less than 1 year accounted for only a very small proportion of ~ 0.6%. (Table 4.1)
Table 4.1: Time spent using mobile phones
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Alid
<1 year
5
.6
.6
.6
1-3 years
194
23.2
23.2
23.8
4-10 years
571
68.4
68.4
92.2
>10 years
65
7.8
7.8
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The survey indexes on the time of using mobile phones of consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very impressive for a developing country like Vietnam and also prove that Vietnamese consumers have a lot of experience using this high-tech device. Moreover, with the majority of consumers surveyed having a relatively long time of use (4-10 years), it partly proves that mobile phones have become an important and essential item in peoples daily lives.
When asked about the mobile phone network they are using, 31% of respondents said they are using the network of Vietel company, 29% use the network of
of Mobifone company, 27% use Vinaphone companys network and 13% use networks of other providers such as E-VN telecom, S-fone, Beeline, Vietnammobile. (Figure 4.1).
Figure 4.1: Mobile phone network in use
Compared with the announced market share of mobile telecommunications service providers in Vietnam (Vietel: 36%, Mobifone: 29%, Vinaphone: 28%, the remaining networks: 7%), we see that the survey results do not have many differences. However, the statistics show that there is a difference in the market share of other networks because the Hanoi market is one of the two main markets of small networks, so their market share in this area will certainly be higher than that of the whole country.
According to a report by NielsenMobile (2009) [8], the number of prepaid mobile phone subscribers in Hanoi accounts for 95% of the total number of subscribers, however, the results of this survey show that the percentage of prepaid subscribers has decreased by more than 20%, only at 70.8%. On the contrary, the number of postpaid subscribers tends to increase from 5% in 2009 to 19.2%. Those who are simultaneously using both types of subscriptions account for 10%. (Table 4.2).
Table 4.2: Types of mobile phone subscribers
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
Prepay
591
70.8
70.8
70.8
Pay later
160
19.2
19.2
89.9
Both of the above
84
10.1
10.1
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The above figures show the change in the psychology and consumption habits of Vietnamese consumers towards mobile telecommunications services, when the use of prepaid subscriptions and junk SIMs is replaced by the use of two types of subscriptions for different purposes and needs or switching to postpaid subscriptions to enjoy better customer care services.
In addition, the majority of respondents have an average spending level for mobile phone services from 100 to 300 thousand VND (406 ~ 48.6% of total respondents). The high spending level (> 500 thousand VND) is the spending level with the lowest number of people with only 8.4%, on the contrary, the low spending level (under 100 thousand VND) accounts for the second highest proportion among the groups of respondents with 25.4%. People with low spending levels mainly fall into the group of students and retirees/housewives - those who have little need to use or mainly use promotional SIM cards. (Table 4.3).
Table 4.3: Spending on mobile phone charges
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
<100,000
212
25.4
25.4
25.4
100-300,000
406
48.6
48.6
74.0
300,000-500,000
147
17.6
17.6
91.6
>500,000
70
8.4
8.4
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The statistics in Table 4.3 are similar to the percentages in the NielsenMobile survey results (2009) with 73% of mobile phone users having medium spending levels and only 13% having high spending levels.
The survey results also showed that up to 31% ~ nearly one-third of respondents said they sent more than 10 SMS messages/day, meaning that on average they sent 1 SMS message for every working hour. Those with an average SMS message volume (from 3 to 10 messages/day) accounted for 51.1% and those with a low SMS message volume (less than 3 messages/day) accounted for 17%. (Table 4.4)
Table 4.4: Number of SMS messages sent per day
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
<3 news
142
17.0
17.0
17.0
3-10 news
427
51.1
51.1
68.1
>10 news
266
31.9
31.9
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
Similar to sending messages, those with an average message receiving rate (from 3-10 messages/day) accounted for the highest percentage of ~ 55%, followed by those with a high number of messages (over 10 messages/day) ~ 24% and those with a low number of messages received daily (under 3 messages/day) remained at the bottom with 21%. (Table 4.5)
Table 4.5: Number of SMS messages received per day
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
<3 news
175
21.0
21.0
21.0
3-10 news
436
55.0
55.0
76.0
>10 news
197
24.0
24.0
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
When comparing the data of the two result tables 4.4 and 4.5, we can see the reasonableness between the ratio of the number of messages sent and the number of messages received daily by the interview participants.
4.3 Current status of SMS advertising and Mobile Marketing
According to the interview results, in the 3 months from the time of the survey and before, 94% of respondents, equivalent to 785 people, said they received advertising messages, while only a very small percentage of 6% (only 50 people) did not receive advertising messages (Table 4.6).
Table 4.6: Percentage of people receiving advertising messages in the last 3 months
Frequency
Ratio (%)
Valid Percentage
Cumulative Percentage
Valid
Have
785
94.0
94.0
94.0
Are not
50
6.0
6.0
100.0
Total
835
100.0
100.0
The results of Table 4.6 show that consumers in the inner city of Hanoi are very familiar with advertising messages. This result is also the basis for assessing the knowledge, experience and understanding of the respondents in the interview. This is also one of the important factors determining the accuracy of the survey results.
In addition, most respondents said they had received promotional messages, but only 24% of them had ever taken the action of registering to receive promotional messages, while 76% of the remaining respondents did not register to receive promotional messages but still received promotional messages every day. This is the first sign indicating the weaknesses and shortcomings of lax management of this activity in Vietnam. (Table 4.7)
div.maincontent .s1 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s2 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s3 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .p { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent p { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; margin:0pt; } div.maincontent .s4 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s5 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s6 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s7 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s8 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s9 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s10 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s11 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s12 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s13 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s14 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s15 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: 6pt; } div.maincontent .s16 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 5.5pt; vertical-align: 3pt; } div.maincontent .s17 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; } div.maincontent .s18 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s19 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s20 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s21 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s22 { color: black; font-family:Courier New, monospace; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s23 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s24 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s25 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s26 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s27 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 1.5pt; } div.maincontent .s28 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s29 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s30 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s31 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s32 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s33 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s35 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s36 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s37 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s38 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 8.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s39 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s40 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 4pt; } div.maincontent .s41 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s42 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s43 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7.5pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s44 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s45 { color: #F00; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s46 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 7pt; vertical-align: 5pt; } div.maincontent .s47 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 11pt; } div.maincontent .s48 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s49 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s50 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s51 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s52 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -2pt; } div.maincontent .s53 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s54 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; vertical-align: -1pt; } div.maincontent .s55 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 10.5pt; } div.maincontent .s56 { color: #00F; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s57 { color: #00F; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s58 { color: #00F; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s59 { color: #00F; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s60 { color: #00F; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s61 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s62 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s63 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .content_head2 { color: #F00; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 14pt; } div.maincontent .s64 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 13pt; } div.maincontent .s67 { color: black; font-family:Arial, sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 9.5pt; } div.maincontent .s68 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s69 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: italic; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; font-size: 12pt; } div.maincontent .s70 { color: black; font-family:Times New Roman, serif; font-style: normal; font-weight: normal; tex](https://tailieuthamkhao.com/uploads/2022/12/03/cac-nhan-to-anh-huong-den-hanh-vi-nguoi-tieu-dung-doi-voi-hoat-dong-13-1-120x90.jpg)

