CONCLUDE
Competition between businesses is becoming increasingly fierce, along with changes in the economic environment, making all businesses concerned about their business performance and want to improve business performance indicators. Therefore, building an effective capital structure policy to improve business performance is one of the top priorities for business administrators. Recognizing that problem, the author has conducted the thesis "The impact of capital structure on business performance of joint stock companies listed on the Vietnamese stock market" and presented the following results:
1. Clarify the theoretical basis of capital structure and business efficiency in enterprises such as concepts, roles and factors affecting capital structure, and indicators for evaluating business efficiency.
2. Apply the model of determining the average cost of capital in enterprises to analyze and verify the research results of the Thesis. On that basis, the thesis proposes a model to predict the optimal capital structure for listed joint stock companies.
Maybe you are interested!
-
The impact of capital structure on business performance of joint stock companies listed on the Vietnamese stock market - 25 -
The Impact of Capital Structure on Business Performance -
Group of Indicators for Efficiency of Capital Use in Production and Business -
The impact of social capital on business performance - a case study of the Textile and Garment industry in the Southern region of Vietnam - 36 -
The impact of capital structure on the sustainability and social efficiency (SPI) of microfinance institutions in Vietnam - 3
3. The results of regression analysis on the impact of capital structure on business performance of listed joint stock companies on the Vietnamese stock market in the period of 2011-2017 show that capital structure has a non-linear inverted U-shaped impact on the profitability of enterprises. When using the Tobin's Q index to represent business performance, the study shows that the impact of capital structure on the market price index Tobin's Q is different according to the quantiles of Tobin's Q. The thesis also demonstrates the different impacts of capital structure on business performance during the economic crisis period and the recovery and development period after the economic crisis.
4. Based on the analysis of the current capital structure of enterprises and the results of regression analysis, the thesis proposes some specific recommendations for listed enterprises and some recommendations for the State. This is the basis for adjusting the capital structure to improve business efficiency for listed enterprises in Vietnam.

The thesis still has some limitations such as the number of survey samples for business managers is still small, the regression model according to the percentiles of capital structure variables has not been studied or the impact of capital structure on different business lines has not been studied. In addition, due to limitations in information and data, the measurement of business performance has only stopped at the indicators assessing the ability to generate profits on equity (ROE) and the indicators of market value (Tobin's
Q) and the construction of new regression models only stops at regression methods for panel data, quantile regression and two-step regression with instrumental variables. The above limitations are also suggestions for future research directions.
LIST OF PUBLISHED WORKS RESEARCH RESULTS OF THE THESIS TOPIC
1. Tran Thi Phuong Thao, 2019, The impact of capital structure on firm value of Vietnamese listed companies – a quantitative regression approach , Journal of International Economics and Management, no. 124.
2. Tran Thi Phuong Thao, 2019, Measuring and forecasting average cost of capital in enterprises , Journal of Economics and Forecasting, No. 24/2019.
3. Nguyen Thuy Anh, Tran Thi Phuong Thao, 2019, The impact of capital structure on firm performance of Vietnamese non-financial listed companies based on agency cost theory , VNU Journal of Science: Economics and Business, No. 35 (2), pp. 24-33; Participated in the International Conference "Vietnam International Conference in Finance (VICIF-2018)" and the International Conference "International Conference of the Business and Applied Sciences Academy of North America (BAASANA - 2018)".
4. Dinh Van Son, Tran Thi Phuong Thao, 2018 , The impact of capital structure on business performance of joint stock companies listed on the Vietnamese stock market , Journal of Commercial Science No. 114, pp. 2-14.
5. Tran Thi Kim Anh, Tran Thi Phuong Thao, 2016, The impact of capital structure on business performance of listed joint stock companies in the transportation and warehousing sector , Foreign Economic Journal No. 85, pp. 94-103.
LIST OF REFERENCES
I. Vietnamese Documents
1. Vu Bang. (2018). Vietnam stock market: Capital mobilization channel for private economic development . Investor Magazine.
2. Nguyen Van Cong. (2009). Discussing business efficiency and the system of indicators reflecting business efficiency . Journal of Economics and Development, No. 144, 112-116.
3. Nguyen Thanh Cuong. (2015). The impact of capital structure on the value of seafood processing enterprises in the South Central Coast . Ho Chi Minh City: Ho Chi Minh City National University.
4. Phan Thanh Hiep. (2017). Analysis of factors affecting the capital structure of Vietnamese industrial manufacturing enterprises . Foreign Trade University: PhD thesis.
5. Hoang Xuan Hoa, Nguyen Quang Huy. (2018). Developing Vietnam's capital market in a modern and integrated market economy . Finance Magazine, http://tapchitaichinh.vn/kinh-te-vi-mo/phat-trien-thi-truong-von-viet-nam-trong- nen-kinh-te-thi-truong-hien-dai-va-hoi-nhap-135146.html, accessed November 3, 2018.
6. Vo Minh Long. (2017). The relationship between capital structure and enterprise value: the case of companies listed on the Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange. Journal of Science - Ho Chi Minh City Open University, 53(2), 45-56.
7. Nguyen Dinh Luan. (2016). Capital structure of Vietnamese enterprises in the integration period: Comments and recommendations . Development and Integration Journal, 26, 3-9.
8. VCBS Research and Analysis Department. (2018). Corporate bond report. Hanoi: Vietcombank Securities Company.
9. Samuelson PA, Nordhaus WD (1997). Economics (translation). Hanoi: National Political Publishing House.
10. Tran Thi Kim Oanh. (2016). Capital structure and performance of Vietnamese enterprises: A quantile regression approach . Journal of Economics and Development, 235, 6--70.
11. Truong Van Phuoc. (2018). Restructuring the financial market to serve high and sustainable economic growth . Nhan Dan Newspaper.
12. Nguyen Van Tao. (2004). Improving business efficiency of enterprises in a market economy. Journal of Commerce, No. 13.
13. Nguyen Xuan Thang, Dam Van Hue, Pham Viet Hung, Vu Ngoc Tuan. (2017). The impact of state ownership on business performance of state-owned joint stock enterprises on the Vietnamese stock market . Journal of Economics and Development, 243, 71-79.
14. Bui Dan Thanh. (2016). Capital structure and working capital affect the financial management efficiency of small and medium enterprises in Ho Chi Minh City . Ho Chi Minh City: Banking University of Ho Chi Minh City.
15. Doan Vinh Thang. (2016). The relationship between capital structure and business performance: the interactive role of state ownership . An Giang University Journal of Science, 10, 20-31.
16. Nguyen Thu Thuy. (2011). Financial Management Textbook . Labor Publishing House.
17. Truong Hong Trinh, Nguyen Phuong Thao. (2015). Determinants of capital structure of A-Reits and the Global Financial Crisis. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 18(1), 3-19.
18. Duong Thi Hong Van. (2014). Research on factors affecting capital structure of listed enterprises on Vietnam stock market . Doctoral thesis, National Economics University.
19. Bui Van Van, Vu Van Ninh. (2013). Corporate finance textbook . Finance Publishing House.
20. Le Hoang Vinh. (2014). Capital structure and financial risk in enterprises. Ho Chi Minh City : PhD thesis - Banking University of Ho Chi Minh City.
21. Vo Xuan Vinh. (2014). Ownership structure and performance of companies on the Vietnamese stock market . Journal of Economics and Development, 203(2), 19-27.
22. State Securities Commission. (2018). Market capitalization data. http://www.ssc.gov.vn/ubck/faces/vi/vimenu/vipages_vithongtinthitruong/thong kettck/quymothitruong?_adf.ctrl- state=ow82onvlv_87&_afrLoop=49446029684466902, accessed February 23, 2019.
II. English Documents
23. Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listed firms in Ghana. Journal of Risk Finance, 6, 438–447.
24. Antoniou A., Guney Y., Paudyal K. (2008). The Determinants of Capital Structure: Capital Market Oriented versus Bank Oriented Institutions . Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 43(1), 59-92.
25. Baker, M.; Wurgler, J. (2002). Market timing and capital structure. Journal of Finance, 57(1), 1-30.
26. Berger AN, E. Bonaccorsi di Patti. (2006). Capital structure and firm performance: A new approach to testing agency theory and an application to the banking industry . Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 1065-1102.
27. Berk, J., DeMarzo, P., Harford, J. (2012). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance , second edition. Prentice Hall.
28. Berle, A.A., & Means, G.C. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan Co.
29. Booth, L., Aivazian, V., Demirguc-Kunt, A., Maksimovic, V. (2001). C apital structures in developing countries. The journal of finance, 87-130.
30. Cheng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chien, C. (2010). Capital structure and firm value in China: A panel threshold regression analysis. African Journal of Business Management, 2500-2507.
31. Chowdhury A.; Chowdhury SP (2010). Impact of capital structure on firm's value: Evidence from Bangladesh. Business and Economic Horizons, 3(3), 111- 122.
32. Damodaran A. (2014). Applied Corporate Finance . New York: John Wiley & Sons.
33. Damodaran A. (2018). Country risk: Determinants measures and implicaitons - The 2018 Edition. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3217944 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3217944.
34. Davis EP, Stone MR (2004). Corporate Financial Structure and Financial Stability. Journal of Financial Stability, 1(1), 65-91.
35. Dawar V. (2014). Agency theory, capital structure and firm performance: Some Indian evidence . Managerial Finance, 40(12).
36. Deesomsak R., Paudyal K., Pescetto G. (2004). The determinants of capital structure: Evidence from the Asia Pacific region. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 14(4), 387-405.
37. Durand D. (1952). Costs of Debt and Equity Funds for Business: Trends and Problems of Measurement. In U.-N. Bureau, Conference on Research in Business Finance (pp. 215-262). Cambridge: NBER.
38. Ebaid IE (2009). The impact of capital structure choice on firm performance: empirical evidence from Egypt. The Journal of Risk Finance, 10(5), 477-487.
39. Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency . Journal of the royal statistical society, 120, 253-290.
40. Feng-Li Lin; Tsangyao Chang. (2011). Does debt affect firm value in Taiwan? A panel threshold regression analysis. Applied Journal, 43, 117-128.
41. Friend I., Lang LHP (1988). An empirical test of the impact of managerial self-interest on corporate capital structure. Journal of finance, 43(2), 271-281.
42. Hansen, B.E. (1999). Threshold e!ects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93, 345-368.
43. Harris, M., & Raviv, A. (1991). The theory of capital structure . The Journal of Finance, 46, 297-355.
44. Jensen, M. and Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305- 360.
45. Jiraporn P., Liu Y. (2008). Capital structure, Staggered Boards, and firm value.
Financial analysis Journal, 64(1), 49-69.
46. John L. (1965). The valuation of risky assets and the selection of risky investments in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(1), 13-37.
47. Jong A.; Kabir R.; Nguyen TT (2008). Capital structure around the world: The roles of firm and country-specific determinants . Journal of Banking and Finance, 32(9), 1954-1969.
48. Khan, MY, Jain, PK (1997). Financial management , second edition. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited.
49. Koenker R., Bassett G. (1978). Regression Quantiles . Econometrica, 46(1), 33- 50.
50. Kraus A., Litzenberger RH (1973). A State-Preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage . Journal of Finance, 911-922.
51. Le Thi Phuong Vy. (2015). Ownership Structure, Capital Structure and Firm Performance: A Study of Vietnamese Listed Firms . Sydney: University of Western Sydney.
52. Margaritis, D., & Psillaki, M. (2007). C apital structure and firm efficiency.
Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34, 1447-1469.
53. Margaritis, D., & Psillaki, M. (2010). C apital structure, equity ownership and firm performance . Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 621–632.
54. Masulis, R. (1983). T he Impact of Capital Structure Change on Firm Value: Some Estimates. Journal of Finance, 38(1), 107-126.
55. Modigliani, F. and Miller, M. (1963). Corporate income taxes and the cost of capital: A correction. American Economic Review, 433-443.





