selling lottery tickets means having to go from morning until late at night, so her mother doesn't have time to take care of or educate Dinh. Dinh also applied for a job but because
No degree so no place will accept. Defendant has not committed any violation.
According to the law, on the day of the crime, the defendant met Mr. Loc and invited him to go out. Seeing that the bicycle was left in front of the house with no one paying attention, the defendant decided to steal. The defendant's mother said that when the incident happened, the police also invited a lawyer to help the family. The lawyer was also very concerned, met and advised the defendant. The defendant and his family realized their mistakes and hoped that after returning from vocational training, the defendant would find a job to support his mother.
Third case : Judgment No. 98 /2010/HS-ST dated September 7 , 2010 of the Court Maybe you are interested!
Bankruptcy Law Is An Effective Legal Tool To Protect The Legitimate Rights And Interests Of Creditors.
Protecting the legitimate rights and interests of individual investors in the stock market in Vietnam - 13
Law on Protecting Children's Rights and Interests When Parents Divorce in Historical Periods in Vietnam
Protecting the interests of depositors at commercial banks according to Vietnamese law - 2
Protecting the rights of depositors at commercial banks according to Vietnamese law - 13
People's Committee of District 3, Ho Chi Minh City
Nguyen Dynasty
History
Phi, birth
February 22, 1993 I committed the crime
right
11-12-2009 (lunar)
16 years old 8 months 20 days).
Phi met Bui Hoa Ky
Culture
borrow
fairy
but no,
Spoken language
soup
Van's dormitory has two people with laptops, which is not ostentatious. Phi bao
The story is about stealing and selling it to share the money.
two high
contagious
steal
ok
Two laptops thanks to Vu Thanh Tam
ok
12,500,000 VND. According to the price
family
According to the Valuation Council, the two laptops above are worth about 22,000,000 VND.
This judgment recognizes
h, before
when awake
porch
Han
violation
I
you
high
know it all
appropriation
consumption
ears
level
crab
you
other
Misconduct will be punished.
foul
peace, law
law
referendum
But due to the engine
greedy, want to have much
fairy
to spend
for category
go
selfishness
ghost person
no effort
workers should
high
Van, Phi, Tam did not
silver steps into the path of crime. Criminal behavior
I
crab
you
was yelled at
dangerous to society, not only directly
next
encroachment
to
profit
suitable
citizen's law
French
law
bag
protect me
brother
to
private
local security. Therefore
, you
high
fade
happy
math
bear
responsibility
the act that I have committed. This is a security case.
essence
Dong Pham
simple,
in which Phi is the instigator and promoter; Van is the direct one.
next
food
porch
work
pham
crime. Apply article 20, article
53 Criminal Code on homosexuality
, The jury will have a level of security
commensurate with the role of crab
high risk
in the case of security. However, also consider
at the investigation agency and the
prescription
today, guys
high
really
rather declare, yes
repentance, repentance, sin
first time
and medicine
case
less serious,
The seized property is of small value and has been recovered.
and return
for you
two therefore apply points g, h, p clause 1, article
46 BLHS for consideration
prison
lighten part of the punishment that the defendants should have suffered.
Trial of the defendant Phi Pham
I
when you
age
young man, after waking up
porch
The criminal has turned himself in. Ap
sculpture
69, drill
1 thing
74, drill 2
Article 46 of the Penal Code for high-ranking defendants
is to have a home.
Review
you
high
have good character
crime in case
how many
detail
prison
light and family has a single
education guarantee, defendants have specific residence,
you
two
have a petition
now
Therefore, based on clauses 1 and 2, article 60 of the Penal Code, it is thought that it is not balanced.
design
catch
you
high
serving a full prison sentence has consequences
tolerance
virtue, deterrence
high
inert
become a good citizen in the future.
Bui Hoa Ky
epitaph
1 year ago
I
steal
couple
ears
level
but for
enjoy the peace
letter
2 year old jelly; Original
Master Chan
Phi bi xu 9
prison for ear theft
san, for peace
hang, time
trial period
h 1 year
6 months; Vu Thanh Tam was sentenced to 1 year in prison for me
ear consumption
level
by you
other
guilty of a crime, given a suspended sentence with a probation period of 2 years.
Comment: the above sentence only shows the motive for the crime, not the punishment.
price level of awareness of news
hazardous substances
for society
crab
Han
violation
crime, nature of behavior
high quality, detailed
prison
light responsibility
picture
the, and not yet said
up
special
point
about personal identity, living conditions and
education, principles
image
pair
with
you
juvenile crime
The above issues must be analyzed in the verdict to be convincing and have educational effect.
Note, the Court's judgment is publicly available, so use the word
need to be exact, for example the amount of money
drill
g 22,000,000 VND is the value of the seized assets.
appropriation, which the judgment determined to be a small amount of money, is easily perverted.
The court should not use words that are derogatory to others, such as the word "that" and other words such as Y, Thị...
Fourth case : Judgment No. 30/2010/HS-ST dated March 12, 2010 of the People's Court of District 5, Ho Chi Minh City, tried Nguyen Van Hung, born in 1984, and Nguyen Huu Tin, born on March 19, 1993, for committing the following crimes:
At about 8:00 p.m. on September 11, 2009, Tin was transporting
Hung by scooter
May
, see Ms. Ly
Huynh Mai stopped the car to buy fruit, around her neck was a white necklace.
The idea of snatching arose. Tin drove the car close to Ms. Mai, Hung pulled the strings.
The police discovered and chased them. They both ran away and hit a bus, causing Hung to fall unconscious. Tin was arrested along with the evidence.
The verdict stated that…the defendant Tin is a minor and has a family.
well-nourished, healthy, and aware of their own actions, although
Not very mature, but because of laziness, defendant Tin wanted money to play games, and defendant Hung had no need to spend money, but when Tin persuaded him, he agreed to commit a crime, although the defendants were aware that their actions were against the law, and the people around them did not agree, but they still committed the crime. This time, the defendants went to snatch property by motorbike, using dangerous tricks... However, the defendants honestly confessed, the consequences had not yet occurred, the property appropriated was not of great value, although this was a case with accomplices, it was simple, defendant Tin was a minor when committing the crime and the crime had not yet been completed, and his family sponsored him. Therefore, it is thought that the defendant should be given some consideration when sentencing.
The lawyer agreed on the charges the Procuracy prosecuted against defendant Tin and presented mitigating circumstances: the defendant committed the crime for the first time, confessed honestly, the consequences had not yet occurred so it was a case of attempted crime, the family's circumstances were difficult, the parents had to leave the countryside to go to the city to make a living.
but not enough
eat, the defendant himself when committing the crime
at the age of not
Because he is a teenager, he is still lacking in thinking and because his educational level is only 4th grade,
awareness of behavior and law is still weak and backward, has family to sponsor, has confirmation from local authorities, defendant's family is a revolutionary family, has grandparents who were awarded the second-class resistance medal by the State. Therefore, it is recommended that the panel of judges give the defendant a sentence commensurate with the crime and there is no need to isolate him from society.
The verdict reads: The panel of judges found that the circumstances presented by the lawyer were well-founded, but the defendant could not be given a suspended sentence because the defendant committed a very serious crime. Although the defendant was young, he was the mastermind and incited others to commit the crime. Today's trial showed that the defendant's family lacked care and supervision over the defendant. Therefore, the lawyer's request cannot be accepted.
Comment: This judgment has an assessment of the cause and conditions of the crime, the motive and cognitive ability of the juvenile offender, and the living conditions of the juvenile offender. However, it still does not analyze Articles 69 and 74 of the Penal Code for application.
punishment for the accused
fox is lacking
persuade, not achieve the purpose of propaganda
to propagate, educate, promote the humanity and humanism of our society.
Note the logic, above the verdict states that the family provided adequate support. Meanwhile, the defense attorney argues that the family's circumstances were difficult, the parents had to leave the countryside to go to the city to earn a living but still did not have enough to eat. Below the panel of judges
again evaluates the details that the lawyer stated as well-founded. These two ideas are contradictory,
state the conclusions of the Trial Council and the opinions of the lawyers.
is right
fade
lenient
civil servant
The issue is very important, in the trial as well as the defense must speak or use words very precisely. In the above case, the defendants snatched
If you get a chain, it cannot be called an attempted crime; you are highly
dream
study
grade 4 culture, awareness
about law
law
Love
cream
is possible,
but it is a continent
is not accurate. Love
in this case.
cream
then maybe but lac
hawk
then can not multiply
nail
Fifth case : Nguyen Thanh C and Nguyen Thanh T committed the crime of intentional injury. While drinking coffee, C and T had a fight with H in the afternoon and were threatened by H's gang that night to beat them up in revenge. Seeing their friend being bullied, T became heroic and wanted to avenge his friend. C and T stole two pairs of scissors from the shop owner for self-defense and then went to find H to talk. C and T stabbed H, causing 54% injury. With these actions, C and T received a 4-year prison sentence for intentional injury.
Sixth case : In the case of Nguyen Dang T and Nguyen Sy H committing robbery: on the evening of October 22, 2003, T borrowed a motorbike and invited H to his girlfriend's house to play, stopping on the way to buy cigarettes. Because he saw that the children were still young
so sister
L owner
The shop hesitated to sell cigarettes, seeing that, T
scolded Ms. L. Mr. Q was sitting in the shop and told Ms. L, "You just sell to customers, if they don't pay, I will pay." T and H thought that Mr. Q had insulted them, so they turned around and started a fight, which scared Mr. Q so much that he quickly started the engine and drove away. Immediately, T and H chased after and beat Mr. Q to the end. After that, T and H also threatened to make Mr. Q pay a fine of 1 million VND to pay for his work.
for they had to fire Mr. Q. With the above actions, T was sentenced to 1 month in prison, H was sentenced to 18 months in prison for robbery.
Sentence 24
Seventh case : In the case of intentional injury, A and N were in the same class and liked each other. A transferred schools, and the relationship between A and N was no longer as close as before. N turned to like H. Hearing a classmate say that H and N went out every day, A became more and more jealous. A invited his neighbor T to go see who H was. The three of them waited in front of N's house. When H came out, A's neighbor picked up a big rock and threw it, breaking H's head, causing 32% permanent injury. For such actions, the People's Court of District 8 sentenced A to 3 years and 6 months in prison, and T to 3 years in prison.