Disagree | 6 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
Central | 23 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 24.2 | |
Valid | Agree | 52 | 43.3 | 43.3 | 67.5 |
Totally agree | 39 | 32.5 | 32.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Maybe you are interested!
-
Research on factors affecting the decision to purchase gypsum board of Huy An private trading enterprise from institutional customers in Ho Chi Minh City - 13 -
Building a Scale and Research Model of Factors Affecting Customers' Decision to Choose a Bank to Deposit Savings at -
Factors affecting the decision of customers to deposit savings at Asia Commercial Joint Stock Bank - 1 -
Expectation Factors Affecting Individual Customers' Decision to Choose a Savings Bank -
Research on factors affecting the decision to purchase gypsum board of Huy An private trading enterprise from institutional customers in Ho Chi Minh City - 2
CHIPHI3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Disagree | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
Central | 25 | 20.8 | 20.8 | 23.3 | |
Valid | Agree | 48 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 63.3 |
Totally agree | 44 | 36.7 | 36.7 | 100.0 | |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Customer Reviews for the Job Impact Group
Statistics
CONGIN1 | CONGVIEC2 | CONGVIEC3 | CV | ||
N | Valid Missing | 120 0 | 120 0 | 120 0 | 120 0 |
Mean | 3.64 | 3.70 | 3.84 | 3.7278 | |
Mode | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 |
CONGIN1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Disagree | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
Central | 48 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 42.5 | |
Valid | Agree | 58 | 48.3 | 48.3 | 90.8 |
Totally agree | 11 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 100.0 | |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CONGVIEC2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | Disagree Central | 2 38 | 1.7 31.7 | 1.7 31.7 | 1.7 33.3 |
Agree
74 | 61.7 | 61.7 | 95.0 | |
Totally agree | 6 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 100.0 |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
CONGVIEC3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Disagree | 3 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 | |
Central | 28 | 23.3 | 23.3 | 25.8 | |
Valid | Agree | 74 | 61.7 | 61.7 | 87.5 |
Totally agree | 15 | 12.5 | 12.5 | 100.0 | |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
Customer Reviews for the Usage Decision Group
Statistics
QUYETDINH1 | QUYETDINH2 | QUYETDINH3 | QD | ||
N | Valid Missing | 120 0 | 120 0 | 120 0 | 120 0 |
Mean | 3.81 | 3.84 | 3.89 | 3.8472 | |
Mode | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.00 |
QUYETDINH1
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Disagree | 10 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.3 | |
Central | 19 | 15.8 | 15.8 | 24.2 | |
Valid | Agree | 75 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 86.7 |
Totally agree | 16 | 13.3 | 13.3 | 100.0 | |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
QUYETDINH2
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Valid | Disagree Central | 5 20 | 4.2 16.7 | 4.2 16.7 | 4.2 20.8 |
Agree
84 | 70.0 | 70.0 | 90.8 | |
Totally agree | 11 | 9.2 | 9.2 | 100.0 |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |
QUYETDINH3
Frequency | Percent | Valid Percent | Cumulative Percent | ||
Disagree | 4 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 3.3 | |
Central | 23 | 19.2 | 19.2 | 22.5 | |
Valid | Agree | 75 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 85.0 |
Totally agree | 18 | 15.0 | 15.0 | 100.0 | |
Total | 120 | 100.0 | 100.0 |